ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-raa-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter

  • To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
  • From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:04:41 -0700

OK.   

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 5:45 PM
To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter


Steve,

One minor change to (3):

(3) Propose next steps for considering such topics.


Thanks,
Tim

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, August 26, 2009 3:24 pm
To: <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx>

I <<2310153.DOC>> really don't see the need for this change but would
not object if Mike's sentence were inserted at the end of the charter
section, see attached. 

Steve Metalitz



-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:05 PM
To: Metalitz, Steven; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter 

Thanks Steve.

I just want to avoid people thinking the registrant
rights/responsibilities
doc is done after the first pass, since new or altered rights or
responsibilities might come out of the work in Section B. I can support
this if it is clarified that the output of Charter section A, when
completed, may be subject to revision upon the completion of Charter
Section
B3 and/or the next steps envisioned by that section. 

Thanks,
Mike

Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1.415.738.8087
www.rodenbaugh.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On
Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:50 PM
To: Avri Doria; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter 

Is there any objection to the revised draft charter circulated a week
ago
(re-attached for ready reference)?

Steve Metalitz


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:38 PM
To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter 



On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:49, Metalitz, Steven wrote:

> Could staff or Avri clarify by what date we would need to reach 
> agreement on the charter in order to get it on the September 3 council

> agenda?


the latest is a week before: 27 August for the charter and a motion but
as
soon as we can is best.

a.







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy