<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
- To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
- From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:04:41 -0700
OK.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 5:45 PM
To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
Steve,
One minor change to (3):
(3) Propose next steps for considering such topics.
Thanks,
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, August 26, 2009 3:24 pm
To: <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
I <<2310153.DOC>> really don't see the need for this change but would
not object if Mike's sentence were inserted at the end of the charter
section, see attached.
Steve Metalitz
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:05 PM
To: Metalitz, Steven; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
Thanks Steve.
I just want to avoid people thinking the registrant
rights/responsibilities
doc is done after the first pass, since new or altered rights or
responsibilities might come out of the work in Section B. I can support
this if it is clarified that the output of Charter section A, when
completed, may be subject to revision upon the completion of Charter
Section
B3 and/or the next steps envisioned by that section.
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1.415.738.8087
www.rodenbaugh.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On
Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:50 PM
To: Avri Doria; gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
Is there any objection to the revised draft charter circulated a week
ago
(re-attached for ready reference)?
Steve Metalitz
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:38 PM
To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Re-revised draft of DT charter
On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:49, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
> Could staff or Avri clarify by what date we would need to reach
> agreement on the charter in order to get it on the September 3 council
> agenda?
the latest is a week before: 27 August for the charter and a motion but
as
soon as we can is best.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|