RE: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - draft motion

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Liz!  I vote to omit.


________________________________

        From: Liz Gasster [mailto:liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 2:42 PM
        To: Rosette, Kristina; gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - draft motion
        
        

        All,

         

        It is language that has been used (with variations) in several
recent PDP working groups. A similar version, with modification, is
being considered for use by both the Operations Steering Committee work
teams and the Policy Process Committee work teams.  I believe it can be
omitted if the group chooses, as I do not believe it is required that
this group offer a suggested work process at this time.

         

        Thanks, Liz 

         

        From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
        Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 11:31 AM
        To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - draft motion

         

        I *think* it's been handled on an ad hoc basis by each WG up
until the FFWG.  I wasn't involved in that drafting team so I don't know
the origin of the language.

         

         

                 

________________________________

                From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 1:01 PM
                To: Rosette, Kristina; gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
                Subject: Re: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - draft motion

                Kristina, I copied this section from the Fast Flux
Working Group Charter. I assumed that these served as the current
guidelines for Working Groups, but I might be wrong here as these were
adopted by the Council before I joined ICANN. How was this handled in
the past? I am more than happy to leave it out and have the GNSO Council
discuss which processes should apply to the Working Group.
                
                Best regards,
                
                Marika
                
                
                On 2/9/09 6:54 PM, "Rosette, Kristina"
<krosette@xxxxxxx> wrote:

                Where did the Working Group Processes section come from?
I've never seen that text before and don't recall our discussing it.
(If I'm wrong on the latter point, please let me know.)  With the
exception of that section, I'm fine with the motion.  I have no
objection to changing the time window to 90 days as Beau suggested.  I
have no objection to Greg's suggested amendment.  
                
                As for the Working Group Processes section, I would
prefer that it be deleted.  If these are the processes to apply, the
decision should be made by the Council and should apply to all WGs - not
just this one.  This is beyond our remit.  As for the substance itself,
I believe the more appropriate terminology for the minority report
should be minority statement.  The persons with the minority view aren't
going to be submitting their own report, right?  In that case, a
"statement" is more accurate.
                
                I have no availability for a call before the 12th.  (I'm
in SF for the INTA Internet Forum and won't be back in DC until
Thursday.)
                
                K

                
                 

                
________________________________


                From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika  Konings
                Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 2:18 PM
                To:  gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
                Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - draft  motion
                
                 
                Dear All,
                
                As mentioned in my previous e-mail,  please find
attached a draft motion for review. Please note that the motion  will
need to be provided to the Council at the latest by Thursday 12 February
in order to be considered at the next GNSO Council meeting on 19
February.  Please share your comments and edits with the list.
                
                Best  regards,
                
                Marika