Re: [gnso-rap-dt] Reverse Domain Name Hijacking as a Registration Abuse
In message <20090901095444.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.e4672b37a5.wbe@xxxxxxxxx ureserver.net>, at 09:54:44 on Tue, 1 Sep 2009, James M. Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes My only remaining question is one of scope: Under what circumstances would Reverse Hijacking (which is an abuse of process governing existing names) be considered a "registration" abuse, versus a "post-registration" or "use" abuse? I've lost track of whether we decided that the only time there can ever be registration abuse is the instant a domain is first registered. (If we have, it certainly clears the decks). But I would argue that the instant of invoking a dispute resolution process to change a domains registration under duress should also qualify. And now I'm thinking along these lines, maybe activating any process to transfer a domain - what if someone is duped into making a transfer (maybe that's also one of the forms of 'theft' spoken of before) should be able to be scrutinised under our remit. -- Roland Perry
|