<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-rap-dt] How the public feels about due process and the internet
- To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] How the public feels about due process and the internet
- From: George Kirikos <icann+rap@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:39:02 -0400
Hi folks,
There was an interesting article today in The Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/oct/18/public-poll-filesharers-internet-ban
which touched upon the issue of due process, albeit in the context of
internet copyright infringement.
"Nearly 70% of those surveyed said someone suspected of illegal
downloading should have a right to a trial in court before
restrictions on internet use were imposed. Only 16% were in favour of
automatic curbs based on accusations by copyright holders such as
musicians, as is proposed by the business department."
""This poll shows people rely on the internet, and an overwhelming
majority think that access should only ever be withdrawn as the result
of court action."
I think the same would apply on other types of alleged abuse. That's
why my focus has been on solutions like Verified WHOIS, to allow
parties to sort out their grievances in real court if there is an
alleged abuse, rather than using suspensions methods which lack due
process. (as would happen in the URS of the IRT, for example)
Sincerely,
George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|