ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-rap-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-rap-dt] agenda: RAPWG meeting 9 November 15:00 UTC

  • To: <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] agenda: RAPWG meeting 9 November 15:00 UTC
  • From: "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:00:42 -0500

The Registration Abuse Policies Work Group call is scheduled for Monday 9
November 2009 at 15:00 UTC (07:00 PST, 10:00 EST, 15:00 London, 16:00 CET).
Agenda is:

 

1. Roll-call

 

2. Review of ICANN Seoul meeting

 

3. Set schedule to publish Initial Report before ICANN Nairobi (7-12 March
2010).  Proposed meeting schedule:

* November 16?

* November 23: Topics TBD: Pay-Per-Click, 419 & scams, Traffic Diversion,
Offensive site, gripe site, Fake Renewal Notices, WHOIS topics, use of
stolen or fraudulent credentials, Domain Tasting, Kiting, sale of
counterfeit goods, false affiliation and unauthorized use of logo.

* December 7: Cybersquatting and Uniformity of Contracts: deadline for
Issue/Background/Recommendations sections to be completely drafted and
posted.  

* December 14: Discuss Cybersquatting and Uniformity of Contracts
Issue/Background/Recommendations.  

* January 4: Deadline for all other Issue/Background/Recommendations
sections -- ALL topic areas.

* January 11: walk through remaining Issue/Background/Recommendations
sections; measure level of consensus.

* January 18: walk through remaining Issue/Background/Recommendations
sections; measure level of consensus.

* January 25: walk through remaining Issue/Background/Recommendations
sections; measure level of consensus.

* February 1: walk through remaining Issue/Background/Recommendations
sections; measure level of consensus.

* February 8: walk through remaining Issue/Background/Recommendations
sections; measure level of consensus.

* February 15. Finalize any last-minute items; PUBLISH INITIAL REPORT.

 

4. updates from sub-groups:

    a. Cybersquatting group

    b.  Uniformity in Contracts group:   We see that there is no uniformity.
The next question is: what does it mean?  The group's task is to understand
if registration abuses are occurring that might be curtailed or better
addressed if there was more uniformity.  Uniformity sub-group was to put
material wiki and flesh it out with text.  

 

With best wishes,

--Greg Aaron

Chair

 

 

 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy