RE: [gnso-rap-dt] Last Call - RAPWG Initial Report - Final Version

["Frederick Felman" <Frederick.Felman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

A few important comments in advance of finalizing this report:

First in Section 8.3

This statement:  

"8.3    Recommendations ? There was strong support for but significant 
opposition for the following recommendation. The two opposing views are below, 
and the RAPWG will further consider these views after receiving public 
comment:"  

Is confusing and editorial as opposed to factual.  Please replace "significant 
opposition" with the number of opposing votes. or remove the clause 

Second Section 6.7.3

I agree with Mike Rodenbaugh's alternate view and would like to be included as 
supporting his assertion.

Last, throughout:

Faisal and I are cited as members of the IPC, which is true that MarkMonitor 
are members of the IPC, however we are non-voting because we are not an 
intellectual property organization like INTA or others and are participation in 
this group is as individuals not as IPC members.  Our work is not blessed or 
approved by the IPC.  Please cite us as such or cite our company as our 
affiliation.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Marika Konings
Sent: Thu 2/11/2010 1:42 AM
To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Last Call - RAPWG Initial Report - Final Version
 
Dear All,

Please find attached the final clean version of the RAPWG Initial Report. If 
you have any corrections or edits, these must be posted to the list today, 
Thursday 11 February, by 15:00 UTC. The document will be posted tomorrow, 
Friday 12 February. To accompany the posting, Greg and I have prepared the 
attached announcement. Please let me know if you have any comments / edits.

In addition, I have discussed with Greg whether it would be good idea to open 
the public comment period at the same time as the publication of the report so 
that it would run for 45 days, instead of 30 days as earlier discussed. In this 
way, the publication and announcement can direct interested parties to the 
public comment forum and it would also allow us to direct Nairobi participants 
there instead of having to wait until after the meeting. Please let me know if 
you have any objections to this proposal. Of course, the public announcement 
would be updated accordingly.

With best regards,

Marika