<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-rap-dt] MP3 Registration Abuse Policy (RAP) WG / 19 April 2010
- To: "'Frederick Felman'" <ffelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'RAP-WG'" <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] MP3 Registration Abuse Policy (RAP) WG / 19 April 2010
- From: "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:40:15 -0400
Significant comment opportunities were given to all interested parties,
including an extended comment period. The public comment period is now
closed. It is not fair to favor any party with extra time and special
opportunities. We also have a deadline to meet before Brussels.
WIPO has participated in ICANN public comment processes many times. It
seems logical to assume that WIPO knows how to convey its positions.
Speaking only for myself, I think I understand Mr. Wilbur?s comments, which
I found articulate.
For these reasons, I am against Fred?s idea.
All best,
--Greg
From: Frederick Felman [mailto:ffelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 4:58 PM
To: Greg Aaron; RAP-WG
Cc: Gisella Gruber-White; Margie Milam; Marika Konings
Subject: Re: [gnso-rap-dt] MP3 Registration Abuse Policy (RAP) WG / 19 April
2010
Dear Greg and members of our Working group,
Listening to the RAP-WG meeting audio of 2010 April 19 I heard number of
questions from the group about the comments made by WIPO contained within
their response to the Initial Draft.
Though some may not fully agree with or understand the intent & content of
their communiqué, the comments do deserve serious consideration based on
WIPO?s standing. My understanding of WIPO is that they have heard ~65% of
all UDRP cases since the instrument?s inception and have documented and
published statistics and results of those cases, they are a non-profit
organization who lose money on each UDRP case that they adjudicate and that
they enjoy cooperation and support from the governments of the majority of
the global population.
I therefore believe we should ask them to more fully explain their comments
via a short question and answer session. Perhaps we can invite them to join
our call for a 15 minute presentation and Q&A session since we will be
discussing Cybersquatting at the next meeting.
If agreeable to the group, I could try to facilitate their participation.
Shall I seek a representative from WIPO to attend our next meeting?
Best ? Fred
On 4/21/10 4:21 PM, "Gisella Gruber-White" <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dear All,
Please find the MP3 recording of the Registration Abuse Policies Working
Group held on Monday, 19 April 2010 at 14:00 UTC at:
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-rap-20100419.mp3
On page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#apr
Present for the teleconference:
Greg Aaron - Registry stakeholder group - Working Group Chair
James Bladel - Godaddy Registrar stakeholder group
Berry Cobb ? CBUC
Martin Sutton ? CBUC
Faisal Shah ? MarkMonitor
Mike O'Connor ? CBUC
Robert Hutchinson ? CBUC
Wendy Seltzer
ICANN Staff
Margie Milam
Glen de Saint Géry
Marika Konings
Gisella Gruber-White
Apologies:
none
Let me know if your name has been left off the list.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Gisella
----------------------------
Gisella Gruber-White
On behalf of GNSO Secretariat
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: gisella.gruber-white@xxxxxxxxx
Tel: +44 7545 334 360
Skype ID: gisella.gw
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|