[gnso-rap-dt] RE: Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I support Option 2.  It is not outside the scope of ICANN, but not enough is 
known at this point in time.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:19 AM
To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation

Dear RAPWG members:

Following our discussion yesterday, please find below the two recommendations 
under consideration in relation to "slamming". In order to measure the level of 
consensus, please indicate your preference for recommendation 1 or 2.

Thanks,

Marika

 *  *   *

Recommendation 1:
The RAPWG recommends nothing and remain in the status quo.
The WG feels this issue falls outside the scope of ICANN policy development and 
enforcement.

Recommendation 2:
The RAPWG recommends the GNSO monitor for this abuse in the gTLD space and 
sponsor research to determine the nature and extent of the problem. The WG 
believes this issue warrants review but notes there is not enough data at this 
time to warrant an Issues Report or PDP.