<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-rap-dt] Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation
- To: "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 07:40:10 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Arial; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>I support Option
#2.</div><div><br></div><div>J.</div><div><br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black;
font-family: verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation<br>
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx><br>
Date: Tue, May 04, 2010 8:18 am<br>
To: "gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx><br>
<br>
<font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:
11pt;">Dear RAPWG members:<br> <br> Following our discussion yesterday,
please find below the two recommendations under consideration in relation to
“slamming”. In order to measure the level of consensus, please indicate your
preference for recommendation 1 or 2. <br> <br> Thanks,<br> <br> Marika<br>
<br> * * *<br> <br> <b>Recommendation
1:<br> </b>The RAPWG recommends nothing and remain in the status quo. <br> The
WG feels this issue falls outside the scope of ICANN policy development and
enforcement. <br> <br> <b>Recommendation 2:<br> </b>The RAPWG recommends
the GNSO monitor for this abuse in the gTLD space and sponsor research to
determine the nature and extent of the problem. The WG believes this issue
warrants review but notes there is not enough data at this time to warrant an
Issues Report or PDP.</span></font>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|