<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-rap-dt] Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation
- To: "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-rap-dt] Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation
- From: martinsutton@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 16:57:06 +0100
I agree with recommendation 2.
Thanks,
Martin
Martin Sutton
Manager, Group Fraud Risk and Intelligence
Ph: ++44 (0)20 7991 8074
Mob: ++44 (0)777 4556680
Sent from my BlackBerry
*********************************
HSBC Holdings plc
Registered Office: 8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ, United Kingdom
Registered in England number 617987
*********************************
----- Original Message -----
From: Marika Konings [marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 04/05/2010 06:18 MST
To: "gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation
Dear RAPWG members:
Following our discussion yesterday, please find below the two recommendations
under consideration in relation to “slamming”. In order to measure the level of
consensus, please indicate your preference for recommendation 1 or 2.
Thanks,
Marika
* * *
Recommendation 1:
The RAPWG recommends nothing and remain in the status quo.
The WG feels this issue falls outside the scope of ICANN policy development and
enforcement.
Recommendation 2:
The RAPWG recommends the GNSO monitor for this abuse in the gTLD space and
sponsor research to determine the nature and extent of the problem. The WG
believes this issue warrants review but notes there is not enough data at this
time to warrant an Issues Report or PDP.
-----------------------------------------
SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT!
This E-mail is confidential.
It may also be legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you
may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of it. If you have
received this message in error, please delete it and all copies
from your system and notify the sender immediately by return
E-mail.
Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely secure,
error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability for any
errors or omissions.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|