RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

["Paul Stahura" <stahura@xxxxxxxx>]

Just because natural persons have a right to privacy in certain
jurisdictions does not mean legal persons have no right.

 

There should not be a distinction, but if this nutty idea manages to
become policy, the distinction should definitely not be made based on
the use of the domain name (commercial or not commercial).

 

I've modified the document and it's attached.  I agree with the "must"
"may" idea.  Can someone translate the document to "must" and "may"
please?

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG) [mailto:Lynn.Goodendorf@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:04 AM
To: Maria Farrell; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

 

Thanks Maria for your response about taking a poll.  That does make
sense.

Does this mean that the revisions that Chris and I have proposed will be
accepted and put forward on our final report back to the whole working
group?

King regards,

-Lynn

 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Maria Farrell
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:49 AM
To: gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

The practice on revisions to rwork reports is for the group in question
to review them and discuss on list whether the changes have broad
agreement. 

 

The Charter of this Working Group emphasises that voting is not a normal
working mechanism of this group. As participation by observers in the
Working Group is open to all, polling is not the most robust mechanism
for measuring support. Previous experience on this issue has also shown
polling to be divisive and destructive of incentives toward cooperation.


 

Hopefully, the draft does indeed achieve a balance that can win
consensus support. If not, there will be successive re-drafting, with
the Chair taking the lead and responsibility for the final report to the
Working Group. 

 

All the best, Maria

 

________________________________

From: Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG) [mailto:Lynn.Goodendorf@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 4:31 PM
To: Chris Gibson; Maria Farrell; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

I would just like to add a comment that I feel these revisions help
achieve the balance needed to win a broad consensus of support.

 

Some members have not been as vocal in our discussions and I do not have
a sense of whether the majority of the group is in agreement.

Since we did not have a teleconference today, is it possible to have
some kind of quick informal poll?

 

Regards,

-Lynn Goodendorf

 

________________________________

From: Chris Gibson [mailto:cgibson@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:12 AM
To: 'Chris Gibson'; 'Maria Farrell'; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG)
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

Sorry for the duplication - this message has the document attached.

 

Chris

 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chris Gibson
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:04 AM
To: 'Maria Farrell'; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG)'
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

 

Dear All,

 

I have attached the draft final report for sub-group C with some
revisions marked in red-line, which Lynn Goodendorf and I propose.  We
believe these suggested changes are helpful to improve some of the
writing, accuracy and balance of the report.

 

Thanks,

 

Chris Gibson

 

  

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Maria Farrell
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 2:12 PM
To: gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

 

Dear all,

 

Attached is the Final Report of Sub Group C, prepared by its chair, Jon
Bing. 

 

We agreed on this week's call to discuss any further - hopefully minor -
changes to the report using this mailing list rather than on a
conference call. 

 

So please review this draft and circulate any comments on it to this
list. Please do use 'track changes' mode if you suggest changes to the
document. 

 

We should expect to finalise this report next week and submit it to the
Working Group. I will also be adding some basic information to it about
membership of the group and attendance.  

 

All the best, Maria

Attachment: Whois Sub Group C report (revised).doc
Description: Whois Sub Group C report (revised).doc