RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

["Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>]

At this stage we are now working on the second draft of the Chair's report
to the Working Group. 
 
It is very late in the day to roll back on the last several weeks of this
group's work. That is frustrating for people who have diligently
participated in the calls and provided drafting work. 
 
At this late stage, we need focused, constructive suggestions for specific
changes to the draft. 
 
It is not enough to say you disagree with something - we need to hear
specifically what you disagree with (disagreeing with 'making a distinction'
is not very helpful to a report which has two categories of distinction - do
you disagree with either or both?) and how you propose to change the draft
to reflect that.
 
If there should be examples, then please provide them. Or ask fellow
constituency members for them. 
 
At this late stage, it appears that the agreements tentatively reached by
this group are unravelling amidst efforts to revisit the discussions in this
report.
 
Can we please focus on making specific changes to the report that can
factually and realistically attract the agreement of others? 
 
Maria
 
 
 
 
 

  _____  

From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 5:03 PM
To: Paul Stahura
Cc: Goodendorf,Lynn (IHG); Chris Gibson; Maria Farrell;
gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C


Nor do I. The last thing we need are more policies that ICANN not only
doesn't enforce, but actually can't. And I question the statement that some
registrars are verifying such a distinction. If so, I would think there
should be some examples - the specific registrars who are doing it and how
they are doing it.
 
Also, I think the changes that Lynn and Chris are suggesting do not
accurately represent the level of support and/or agreement of the group.


Tim 




-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C
From: "Paul Stahura" <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, May 30, 2007 9:58 am
To: "Goodendorf,  Lynn (IHG)" <Lynn.Goodendorf@xxxxxxx>,  "Chris
Gibson" <cgibson@xxxxxxxxxxx>,  "Maria Farrell"
<maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>,  <gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx>


I do not believe a distinction should be made.


  _____  

From: Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG) [mailto:Lynn.Goodendorf@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 7:31 AM
To: Chris Gibson; Maria Farrell; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

I would just like to add a comment that I feel these revisions help achieve
the balance needed to win a broad consensus of support.

Some members have not been as vocal in our discussions and I do not have a
sense of whether the majority of the group is in agreement.
Since we did not have a teleconference today, is it possible to have some
kind of quick informal poll?

Regards,
-Lynn Goodendorf


  _____  


From: Chris Gibson [mailto:cgibson@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:12 AM
To: 'Chris Gibson'; 'Maria Farrell'; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG)
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

Sorry for the duplication - this message has the document attached.

Chris


  _____  

From: owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chris Gibson
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:04 AM
To: 'Maria Farrell'; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG)'
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

Dear All,

I have attached the draft final report for sub-group C with some revisions
marked in red-line, which Lynn Goodendorf and I propose.  We believe these
suggested changes are helpful to improve some of the writing, accuracy and
balance of the report.

Thanks,

Chris Gibson

  

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Maria Farrell
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 2:12 PM
To: gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

Dear all,

Attached is the Final Report of Sub Group C, prepared by its chair, Jon
Bing. 

We agreed on this week's call to discuss any further - hopefully minor -
changes to the report using this mailing list rather than on a conference
call. 

So please review this draft and circulate any comments on it to this list.
Please do use 'track changes' mode if you suggest changes to the document. 

We should expect to finalise this report next week and submit it to the
Working Group. I will also be adding some basic information to it about
membership of the group and attendance.  

All the best, Maria