RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

["Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>]

The report consists of two separate types of distinction. It does not
require a distinction between natural and legal persons to be made on the
basis of use of the domain name.
 
The methods for how this sub group and the Working Group as a whole are to
reach and document agreement are set out in the Charter of this group which
was agreed by the GNSO Council. This sub group does not have the authority
to change its working methods as it goes along. 
 
Can everyone please keep in mind that this sub group's role is to collect
and present options, not to decide on outcomes?
 
Maria

  _____  

From: Paul Stahura [mailto:stahura@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 5:35 PM
To: Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG); Maria Farrell; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C



Just because natural persons have a right to privacy in certain
jurisdictions does not mean legal persons have no right.

 

There should not be a distinction, but if this nutty idea manages to become
policy, the distinction should definitely not be made based on the use of
the domain name (commercial or not commercial).

 

I've modified the document and it's attached.  I agree with the "must" "may"
idea.  Can someone translate the document to "must" and "may" please?

 

 

 

  _____  

From: Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG) [mailto:Lynn.Goodendorf@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:04 AM
To: Maria Farrell; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

 

Thanks Maria for your response about taking a poll.  That does make sense.

Does this mean that the revisions that Chris and I have proposed will be
accepted and put forward on our final report back to the whole working
group?

King regards,

-Lynn

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Maria Farrell
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:49 AM
To: gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

The practice on revisions to rwork reports is for the group in question to
review them and discuss on list whether the changes have broad agreement. 

 

The Charter of this Working Group emphasises that voting is not a normal
working mechanism of this group. As participation by observers in the
Working Group is open to all, polling is not the most robust mechanism for
measuring support. Previous experience on this issue has also shown polling
to be divisive and destructive of incentives toward cooperation. 

 

Hopefully, the draft does indeed achieve a balance that can win consensus
support. If not, there will be successive re-drafting, with the Chair taking
the lead and responsibility for the final report to the Working Group. 

 

All the best, Maria

 

  _____  

From: Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG) [mailto:Lynn.Goodendorf@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 4:31 PM
To: Chris Gibson; Maria Farrell; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

I would just like to add a comment that I feel these revisions help achieve
the balance needed to win a broad consensus of support.

 

Some members have not been as vocal in our discussions and I do not have a
sense of whether the majority of the group is in agreement.

Since we did not have a teleconference today, is it possible to have some
kind of quick informal poll?

 

Regards,

-Lynn Goodendorf

 

  _____  

From: Chris Gibson [mailto:cgibson@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:12 AM
To: 'Chris Gibson'; 'Maria Farrell'; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG)
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

Sorry for the duplication - this message has the document attached.

 

Chris

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chris Gibson
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:04 AM
To: 'Maria Farrell'; gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Goodendorf, Lynn (IHG)'
Subject: RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

 

Dear All,

 

I have attached the draft final report for sub-group C with some revisions
marked in red-line, which Lynn Goodendorf and I propose.  We believe these
suggested changes are helpful to improve some of the writing, accuracy and
balance of the report.

 

Thanks,

 

Chris Gibson

 

  

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Maria Farrell
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 2:12 PM
To: gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

 

Dear all,

 

Attached is the Final Report of Sub Group C, prepared by its chair, Jon
Bing. 

 

We agreed on this week's call to discuss any further - hopefully minor -
changes to the report using this mailing list rather than on a conference
call. 

 

So please review this draft and circulate any comments on it to this list.
Please do use 'track changes' mode if you suggest changes to the document. 

 

We should expect to finalise this report next week and submit it to the
Working Group. I will also be adding some basic information to it about
membership of the group and attendance.  

 

All the best, Maria