Re: [gnso-reg-sgc] Draft Final Report of Sub Group C

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 30 maj 2007, at 12.25, Paul Stahura wrote:

> 2) Therefore that leaves a distinction based on nature of the
> registrant.  I happen to believe that we should not make this
> distinction IF the result of the distinction is that legal persons  
> MUST
> (sorry for the caps, just trying to emphasize important words, Im not
> yelling) be "outed" in the whois, because legal entities have  
> legitimate
> reasons to not be "outed", for example, for competitive reasons.   
> IF the
> MUST is a MAY, then I'm OK with having the distinction, but then I  
> don't
> see the purpose of it because natural persons can use a proxy  
> service to
> protect their privacy, so why have the distinction?

or an abused women and child shelter.  or a political expression group.

a.