ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-res-sga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-res-sga] Whois working group -- subgroup A (reponsibilities)

  • To: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-res-sga] Whois working group -- subgroup A (reponsibilities)
  • From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 09:54:50 -0400

What is the status of receiving clarification on the scope issue that I raised on last week's call? I may not be able to participate today, but I would like to keep this question alive.

Thanks,

-ross

Metalitz, Steven wrote:
Subgroup A participants,
Since the last meeting we have received only the submissions from Hugh and Steve D. I suggest that we focus on those for our call today. I hope there will be more proposals for discussion on our next call. I also call your attention to the "must/may" document tracking OPOC that Paul Stahura posted to the main list the other day. This is helpful for orienting our discussion in the overall framework of the OPOC proposal. Steve Metalitz
Hugh's submission: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-res-sga/msg00004.html
Steve's submission: see below
Paul's submission: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-whois-wg/msg00198.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* owner-gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Hugh Dierker
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1:22 PM
*To:* gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: [gnso-res-sga] Whois working group -- subgroup A (reponsibilities)


Steve,
I think we have a real sticky wicket holding the OPoC liable for content on a website.
The insurance cost would be huge and it would require each OPoC to be a publisher/editor
Liability issues on matters like libel prevent this from being cost effective.
Eric


*/Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>/* wrote:


as discussed on our first call last week, here are my personal suggestions for the OPoC responsibilities, arranged according to Steve Metalitz' 4 questions. Looking forward to our discussion tomorrow.

    --Steve DelBianco


1. WHO is the OPOC: qualifications, identification to/ verification
by registrar, need for consent before listing, etc:


    OPoC must have the technical capability, or have immediate access to
    someone who has the technical capability, to address technical or
    operational issues regarding activity related to the Registrant's
    domain.

    The OPoC must have the technical capability and permissions to take
    down a registrant's site.

    The OPoC should be a legal agent of the registrant, and must
    acknowledge in advance that they could be liable for registrant's
    illegal activities

    -----------------------------------------------------
    2. WHAT issues is the OPOC required to handle - or not:

    OPoC must provide accurate and complete details for 24/7 contact
    information.

    At time of registration or upon any change in OPoC designation, the
    Registrar must validate the completeness and accuracy of contact
    information provided.

    At time of registration or upon any change in OPoC designation, the
    Registrar should roll proxy contacts to the OPoC.

OPoC must maintain accurate published data.

OPoC must not knowingly allow bad faith or illegal activity at the
domain.


    OPoC must accept contacts of any nature, ranging from technical,
    administrative, IP conflict, legal notices, contact from law
    enforcement, on behalf of the registered name holder. The OPoC must
    receive and forward any communications to the registrant.

    Upon communicating with the registrant, the OPoC must ensure that
    the Registrant communicates a response or resolution of the
    applicable issue.

If the OPoC is properly informed that their registrant is phishing,
the OPoC has the responsibility to take the site down immediately
upon proper notice. If the OPoC then fails to take the site down,
the OPoC would be contributorily liable.


-----------------------------------------------------
3. WHEN must the OPoC act - time frames for response, etc:


    OPoC must be responsible for forwarding, within 12 hours of receipt,
    any correspondence and requests to contact the registrant and/or a
    technical resource for the registrant.

    OPoC must investigate and take appropriate action (without
    unreasonable delay, or, as soon as reasonably possible) in response
    to notice of illegal activity at the domain.

    -----------------------------------------------------
    4.. HOW would these responsibilities be enforced - what happens if
    they are not fulfilled?

    If an OPoC fails to meet their defined responsibilities in the
    required response period, resolution of the domain name should be
    immediately suspended in these steps:

    1. Registrar shall immediately suspend name records for the affected
    domain and suspend webhost services.

    2. Registrar shall immediately convey full owner Whois details to
    the complainant.

    3. Registry shall suspend website DNS, although TTL means that
    resolutions would still occur for 24-48 hours.

    4. Registry shall lock the domain so that it cannot be transferred.
    The name should be available for resale after __ days unless the
    registrant has initiated an approved disputer resolution mechanism.

    Steps taken to suspend resolution should not prejudice any party's
    ability to pursue appeals or alternate dispute resolution mechanisms.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Food fight? <http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx?link=ask&sid=396545367> Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A. <http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx?link=ask&sid=396545367>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy