RE: [gnso-res-sga] DRAFT Subgroup A report
- To: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>, "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-res-sga] DRAFT Subgroup A report
- From: "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:38:36 -0400
I will not be on tomorrow's call (I'll be testifying in U.S.
Congress--on data security issues, as it turns out) so here is my
personal preface to the Subgroup A document:
As I understand it, the OPoC system has been proposed in order to
improve privacy protection for registered name holders. Our goal should
be to improve privacy without compromising the ability of law
enforcement and business interests to investigate and terminate illegal
activity occurring on web sites. That is why subgroup A suggests the
"3 R's" of responsibility for OPoCs (Relay, Reveal, and Remedy).
Absent these responsibilities, the OPoC system would be abused by
registrants with illegal intentions, if only to buy time for them to
profit from illegal activities such as phishing and pharming.
NetChoice and Business Constituency
From: owner-gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 10:24 AM
To: Maria Farrell; gnso-res-sga@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-res-sga] DRAFT Subgroup A report
Subgroup A participants,
With apologies for the delay, please see a draft subgroup report
attached. Your comments would be most useful if received by 12 noon Edt
tomorrow (Tuesday). Thanks in advance.