<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:15:58 -0400
It is my understanding as well that there would be one vice chair per
house. Wasn't that previously resolved?
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:39 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds
>
>
>
> On balance thresholds are so important that getting them in
> the by-laws does make sense.
>
> On vice-chairs, I thought the idea was to have 2 vice-chairs
> (one per house).
> This needs to be resolved before we talk about selection methods.
>
> Philip
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|