<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q14 on privacy laws
- To: "'Gomes, Chuck'" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q14 on privacy laws
- From: "Terry L Davis, P.E." <tdavis2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:39:23 -0700
Likewise I support this.
Take care
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:56 AM
To: Philip Sheppard; gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q14 on privacy laws
I support this as well.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 9:22 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q14 on privacy laws
>
>
> Tim suggests:
> Thanks for explaining. Would it work then to qualify the
> language to something like "applicapable privacy law as it
> pertains to personally identifiable information," or
> something like that?
> --------------
> I support.
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|