RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Opinion gather on q3

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My responses to the Doodle poll are my own personal views and are not
necessarily the views of the RyC; I have initiated a request for input
from the RyC on this and will communicate that if it differs from mine.

I prefer option 2 (The Nomcom assigns NCAs to a house or to the
non-house option) assuming that the NomCom is given some general
qualifications from the GNSO that include some general familiarity with
the Houses and the Council and that the NomCom is encouraged to select
someone for the non-voting seat who may have meeting leadership skills;
b) I lean toward option 7 (Should be defined in GSNO Process and
Procedures) instead of option 6 (Should be defined in the By-laws)
because I think this is an area where we will learn a lot over time so
we may need some flexibility.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 2:32 PM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Opinion gather on q3
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As an opinion gathering experiment, I have set up a doodle 
> poll on this issue.
> http://www.doodle.com/x2ey9ydpq5rga7u9
> 
> The poll text reads:
> 
> 
> "There seems to be agreement that the method by which NCAs 
> are assigned to a house should be decided and documented.
> 
> Three options seem to be the prevailing options.
> 
> This poll is trying to bring out which, if any, of the 
> options is favored.
> 
> The questions are also asked whether, despite having a 
> preference, you are willing to accept the prevalent method 
> and whether this should be defined in by-laws.
> 
> The results of the poll will be used as input to our 
> discussions and not as the decision."
> 
> thanks
> 
> a.
> 
> 
>