Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.
Thanks Avri for all that work. I'm fine with the proposed process. I have informed the RrC of the proposed new bylaws document and asked for any comments to be sent to me before the end of the week. That should then give me time to confer with the RrC Excom in time for our Sydney Council meeting. Thanks, Stéphane Le 09/06/09 00:34, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > Hi, > > I have edited the text. It can be found at: > https://st.icann.org/gnso_transition/index.cgi?proposed_by_laws > > I think I caught it all but it needs to be checked. > > In terms of motions and voting, I propose the following: > > - the motion included below be put in the schedule of 24 June. I will > put myself down as the person making the motion. It will of course > need a second. > > - any wording changes that we can reach consensus on on this list, can > be treated as friendly amendments and just put in before the vote. > Since I will be making the motion of behalf of this team, it is the > consensus of this team that will indicate whether it is a friendly > amendment or not. > > - any changes we cannot reach consensus on, can be voted on as > amendments before voting on the main motion. Of course someone will > have to make and second these motions. > > By doing this, we can both present the rough consensus position to the > Board as well as the results of any minority positions. > > The motion: > > Whereas > > Insert long history here that includes, review, BCG, Board approval of > BCG, work of the team of the whole and SIC response: (hopefully staff > can help in writing this chronology) > > Resolved > > The GNSO recommends that the By-laws related to the GNSO council be > amended to read as follows: > > insert the text either by inclusion or reference: > https://st.icann.org/gnso_transition/index.cgi?proposed_by_laws > > > thanks > > a. > > > > >