RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.
Avri, These two items do not jive. Shouldn't the latter be changed to "...increased to be six..."? Article X Section 1: d. six representatives selected from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group; and Article XX Section 5: d. The three seats currently assigned to the Non-Commercial Users Constituency shall be reassigned as three seats of the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting. From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, June 08, 2009 5:34 pm To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx Hi, I have edited the text. It can be found at: https://st.icann.org/gnso_transition/index.cgi?proposed_by_laws I think I caught it all but it needs to be checked. In terms of motions and voting, I propose the following: - the motion included below be put in the schedule of 24 June. I will put myself down as the person making the motion. It will of course need a second. - any wording changes that we can reach consensus on on this list, can be treated as friendly amendments and just put in before the vote. Since I will be making the motion of behalf of this team, it is the consensus of this team that will indicate whether it is a friendly amendment or not. - any changes we cannot reach consensus on, can be voted on as amendments before voting on the main motion. Of course someone will have to make and second these motions. By doing this, we can both present the rough consensus position to the Board as well as the results of any minority positions. The motion: Whereas Insert long history here that includes, review, BCG, Board approval of BCG, work of the team of the whole and SIC response: (hopefully staff can help in writing this chronology) Resolved The GNSO recommends that the By-laws related to the GNSO council be amended to read as follows: insert the text either by inclusion or reference: https://st.icann.org/gnso_transition/index.cgi?proposed_by_laws thanks a.