ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.

  • To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:09:30 +0200


I don't know. I read that to mean that the 3 from NCUC were to be assigned as three of the (six) NCSG. but I am will certainly fix the wording. Any suggestions?



On 9 Jun 2009, at 13:38, Tim Ruiz wrote:


These two items do not jive. Shouldn't the latter be changed to
"...increased to be six..."?

Article X Section 1:
d. six representatives selected from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder
Group; and

Article XX Section 5:
d. The three seats currently assigned to the Non-Commercial Users
Constituency shall be reassigned as three seats of the Non-Commercial
Stakeholder Group.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, June 08, 2009 5:34 pm
To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx


I have edited the text. It can be found at:

I think I caught it all but it needs to be checked.

In terms of motions and voting, I propose the following:

- the motion included below be put in the schedule of 24 June. I will
put myself down as the person making the motion. It will of course
need a second.

- any wording changes that we can reach consensus on on this list, can
be treated as friendly amendments and just put in before the vote.
Since I will be making the motion of behalf of this team, it is the
consensus of this team that will indicate whether it is a friendly
amendment or not.

- any changes we cannot reach consensus on, can be voted on as
amendments before voting on the main motion. Of course someone will
have to make and second these motions.

By doing this, we can both present the rough consensus position to the
Board as well as the results of any minority positions.

The motion:


Insert long history here that includes, review, BCG, Board approval of
BCG, work of the team of the whole and SIC response: (hopefully staff
can help in writing this chronology)


The GNSO recommends that the By-laws related to the GNSO council be
amended to read as follows:

insert the text either by inclusion or reference:



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy