ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-restruc-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Changes

  • To: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Changes
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:01:44 -0400

Looks good to me.  The redline was very helpful.  Thanks Steve and Avri
for your work on this.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:47 PM
> To: Avri Doria; gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Changes
> 
> A <<redline of AD text of 061009 (2266360).DOC>> vri, 
> 
> Thanks for updating the document.  I attach a redline of your 
> text which corrects the paragraph numbering, deletes an 
> obsolete cross-reference, and also suggests the following 
> technical changes for consideration:
> 
> 1.  Specifies that the Nom Comm assigns the NCAs to the various slots.
> This has to be spelled out somewhere in the by-laws.  Of 
> course there may also need to be a cross-reference to the Nom 
> Comm provision of the By-laws.  But worth including as a 
> reminder to whoever finally integrates this into a single 
> by-law amendment.  
> 
> 2.  Similarly, the method of selecting Seats 13 and 14 needs 
> to appear in the By-laws, so I have added a placeholder to 
> that effect. 
> 
> 3.  The wording of the term limits provision could be read to 
> prohibit a second term after a gap of less than 2 years.  I 
> don't think that was
> the intent, so have suggested corrective wording.   It still 
> requires a
> 2-year gap if the person has served two consecutive terms.   
> 
> 4.  Throughout the Transition Article, I have added a 
> reference to the Board's authority to adopt a resolution 
> changing the date from October 2009. Again, this is mostly in 
> the nature of a placeholder.  We would not want the entire 
> amendment to be hung up because for some reason something 
> that was supposed to be done by Seoul did not happen.
> 
> Thanks for considering these.  Of course if there is an 
> objection to one
> of these we can follow the amendment procedure if need be.   
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:56 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Changes
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If anyone objects to the changes i made yesterday in:
> 
> https://st.icann.org/gnso_transition/index.cgi?proposed_by_laws
> 
> please let know.
> 
> If I don't hear from anyone by tomorrow morning CEST I will 
> remove the markings on the additions and delete the ruled out text.
> 
> thanks
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy