<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Changes
- To: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Changes
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:01:44 -0400
Looks good to me. The redline was very helpful. Thanks Steve and Avri
for your work on this.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:47 PM
> To: Avri Doria; gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Changes
>
> A <<redline of AD text of 061009 (2266360).DOC>> vri,
>
> Thanks for updating the document. I attach a redline of your
> text which corrects the paragraph numbering, deletes an
> obsolete cross-reference, and also suggests the following
> technical changes for consideration:
>
> 1. Specifies that the Nom Comm assigns the NCAs to the various slots.
> This has to be spelled out somewhere in the by-laws. Of
> course there may also need to be a cross-reference to the Nom
> Comm provision of the By-laws. But worth including as a
> reminder to whoever finally integrates this into a single
> by-law amendment.
>
> 2. Similarly, the method of selecting Seats 13 and 14 needs
> to appear in the By-laws, so I have added a placeholder to
> that effect.
>
> 3. The wording of the term limits provision could be read to
> prohibit a second term after a gap of less than 2 years. I
> don't think that was
> the intent, so have suggested corrective wording. It still
> requires a
> 2-year gap if the person has served two consecutive terms.
>
> 4. Throughout the Transition Article, I have added a
> reference to the Board's authority to adopt a resolution
> changing the date from October 2009. Again, this is mostly in
> the nature of a placeholder. We would not want the entire
> amendment to be hung up because for some reason something
> that was supposed to be done by Seoul did not happen.
>
> Thanks for considering these. Of course if there is an
> objection to one
> of these we can follow the amendment procedure if need be.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:56 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Changes
>
>
> Hi,
>
> If anyone objects to the changes i made yesterday in:
>
> https://st.icann.org/gnso_transition/index.cgi?proposed_by_laws
>
> please let know.
>
> If I don't hear from anyone by tomorrow morning CEST I will
> remove the markings on the additions and delete the ruled out text.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|