Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] updated draft of bylaws
One comment on ARTICLE X: GENERIC NAMES SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION; SECTION 3. GNSO COUNCIL. 6. Just for clarity and consistency sake, we should add the word "members" after "six" and put it in parenthesis for NCSG - the same way this is communicated for the other SG's. So it would read:6. Typically for voting purposes, the GNSO Council (see Section 3(1) of this Article) shall be organized into a bicameral house structure as described below: a. the Contracted Parties House includes the Registries Stakeholder Group (three members), the Registrar Stakeholder Group (three members), and one voting member appointed by the ICANN Nominating Committee for a total of seven voting members; and b. the Non Contracted Party house includes the Commercial Stakeholder Group (six members), the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (six members), and one voting member appointed by the ICANN Nominating Committee to that House for a total of thirteen voting members. INSTEAD of :6. Typically for voting purposes, the GNSO Council (see Section 3(1) of this Article) shall be organized into a bicameral house structure as described below: a. the Contracted Parties House includes the Registries Stakeholder Group (three members), the Registrar Stakeholder Group (three members), and one voting member appointed by the ICANN Nominating Committee for a total of seven voting members; and b. the Non Contracted Party house includes the Commercial Stakeholder Group (six members), the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group six, and one voting member appointed by the ICANN Nominating Committee to that House for a total of thirteen voting members. Thank you, Robin On Jun 11, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Avri Doria wrote: Hi,I have gone through the changes and accepted all of the trivial changes.On the substantive changes 1. I accepted the addition of: > House by the Nominating Committee. but not > at the time of appointment 2. have left the deletion of: > The GNSO Council may also have observers as > described in paragraph 9 of this Section (link TBD) as yet unresolved because no one has commented yet.I am not sure I understand why this needs to be deleted as we do inviteobservers into the meeting from time to time. 3. left > , [placeholder regarding manner of selection – TBD by Board.] unresolved.My impression is that I should remove it, and it should be voted on as aseparate amendment, but I would lke to hear a few more voices on on how to handle this if possible. 4. accepted the clarifying change related to serving consecutive terms 5. accepted the addition of several instance of: > , or another date as the Board may designate by resolution.I have attached the current version, and will update the one on the wiki tomatch it when i get a chance. thanks a. <Bylaws-update-090611> IP JUSTICE Robin Gross, Executive Director 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|