<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] updated draft of bylaws
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] updated draft of bylaws
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:45:03 -0400
Thanks Avri. Great work. Assuming that we should all forward this to
our constituencies ASAP, I just did so for the RyC.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 3:29 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] updated draft of bylaws
>
> Hi,
>
> I have gone through the changes and accepted all of the
> trivial changes.
>
> On the substantive changes
>
> 1. I accepted the addition of:
>
> > House by the Nominating Committee.
>
> but not
>
> > at the time of appointment
>
> 2. have left the deletion of:
>
> > The GNSO Council may also have observers as
> > described in paragraph 9 of this Section (link TBD)
>
> as yet unresolved because no one has commented yet.
> I am not sure I understand why this needs to be deleted as we
> do invite observers into the meeting from time to time.
>
>
> 3. left
>
> > , [placeholder regarding manner of selection - TBD by Board.]
>
> unresolved.
>
> My impression is that I should remove it, and it should be
> voted on as a separate amendment, but I would lke to hear a
> few more voices on on how to handle this if possible.
>
> 4. accepted the clarifying change related to serving consecutive terms
>
> 5. accepted the addition of several instance of:
>
> > , or another date as the Board may designate by resolution.
>
>
> I have attached the current version, and will update the one
> on the wiki to match it when i get a chance.
>
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|