<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO WG Self Assessment Questionnaire
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO WG Self Assessment Questionnaire
- From: "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 21:33:48 +0000
Chuck,
The best indication we have of responders by stakeholder group and constituency
is based on whether a responder elects to answer the set of questions
pertaining to that stakeholder group or constituency. Here is the graphic that
depicts that. Registry responses are at about 10.
[cid:image006.png@01CFCD04.3636D480]
Larisa
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 2:23 PM
To: Larisa B. Gurnick; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Marika Konings
Subject: RE: GNSO WG Self Assessment Questionnaire
Thanks Larisa. Can you tell me how many responded from the RySG?
Chuck
From: Larisa B. Gurnick [mailto:larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:18 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marika Konings
Subject: RE: GNSO WG Self Assessment Questionnaire
Chuck,
I hope this is easier to read. I've also attached the same information in a
pdf format.
[cid:image007.png@01CFCD04.3636D480]
[cid:image008.png@01CFCD04.3636D480]
Best wishes,
Larisa
From: Gomes, Chuck
[mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 1:58 PM
To: Larisa B. Gurnick; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marika Konings
Subject: RE: GNSO WG Self Assessment Questionnaire
Sorry for the type Larisa.
Chuck
From: Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:57 PM
To: 'Larisa B. Gurnick';
gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marika Konings
Subject: RE: GNSO WG Self Assessment Questionnaire
Lisa,
The chart with the breakout of the 74 survey responses is too small to see the
detail. Is it easily possible to provide a table with the data?
Chuck
From: Larisa B. Gurnick
[mailto:larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:07 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marika Konings
Subject: RE: GNSO WG Self Assessment Questionnaire
Chuck and the GNSO Review Working Party,
Thank you for your feedback on the GNSO WG Assessment survey. The Supplemental
Survey focused on the Working Groups will be launched after the main Assessment
closes on 23 September. The Westlake team is updating the Supplemental WG
Assessment based on feedback collected from the GNSO Review Working Party and
staff.
Outreach and communications continue, as follows, along with ongoing social
media support:
* Announcement of Extension of 360
Assessment<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-09-03-en> - 3
September
* Blog by Jen
Wolfe<https://www.icann.org/news/blog/gnso-review-deadline-extended-to-23-september-participate-and-make-your-voices-heard>
- 5 September
* Reminders to complete started 360 Assessment from Westlake Governance
- 9 September
* Meetings/updates with interested Stakeholder Groups, Constituencies,
SOs and ACs during the LA meeting - in process
Please continue to emphasize the importance of providing feedback via the 360
Assessment within your groups and kindly complete the survey, if you have not
had a chance to do so yet - https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GNSOREVIEW360SURVEY.
Here is the latest update as of 9 September:
[cid:image009.png@01CFCD04.3636D480]
Thank you for your ongoing support and help,
Larisa
From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx]>
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:34 AM
To: Marika Konings; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO WG Self Assessment Questionnaire
Marika,
I haven't yet had time to listen to the MP3 from last week's meeting. Was the
issue I raised about the timing of doing this survey discussed?
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 8:11 AM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO WG Self Assessment Questionnaire
Dear All,
As discussed during last week's meeting, please find attached a copy of the
GNSO WG self-assessment review tool. As a reminder, the GNSO Operating
Procedures specify on this point that:
7.0: Working Group Self-Assessment
A WG Self-Assessment instrument has been developed as a means for Chartering
Organizations to formally request feedback from a WG as part of its closure
process. WG members are asked a series of questions about the team's inputs,
processes (e.g., norms, decision-making, logistics), and outputs as well as
other relevant dimensions and participant experiences. Screenshots of the
questionnaire have been assembled into a PDF (see link below) so that WG
participants can review, in advance, how it is designed and what specific
information will be solicited.
During the WG's closure process, coordinating with the Chair, Staff will
provide a unique link (URL) to the online questionnaire along with open and
close dates and any specific instructions. Staff will then perform the
following actions:
* Monitor the online process providing status updates to the WG Chair;
* Provide technical assistance to WG members if requested;
* Notify the Chair when all team members have completed the questionnaire;
and, following the close date,
* Summarize the feedback in a written report to the Chartering Organization.
Best regards,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|