Re: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March

[Mike Rodenbaugh <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

With apologies for the slight delay over the weekend, the IPC's initial
comments on the Working Text are attached.  Please let me know any
questions.

Thanks,
Mike

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
http://rodenbaugh.com

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Ron Andruff <RA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> First, please allow me to express my apologies for dropping off of this
> discussion group pre-Singapore due to too much on my plate.  I believe that
> Steve Coates and perhaps one other BC member have joined in replacement.
>
>
>
> Notwithstanding stepping back, I was just going through Chuck’s comments
> on the draft working text and wanted to also weigh-in on the following:
>
>
>
> *1.    **From our research, we understand the NCUC, NPOC and NCSG
> membership lists are publicly available. The following SGs/Cs do not make
> membership information publicly available:  *
>
> * The RrSG and RySG   IPC   ISCPC and BC*
>
>
>
> The BC membership list is the first thing noted on our web site, right
> above our Charter: http://www.bizconst.org/members/
>
>
>
> *2.    **That the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on Early Engagement
> continue its two work streams as priority projects. As a part of its work
> it should consider how the GAC could appoint a liaison (non-voting) to each
> GNSO PDP WG as a means of providing timely non-binding input.*
>
>
>
> Having been actively engaged in discussions for one (or more) GAC members
> to join the Nominating Committee, the issues govenrments face in providing
> liaisons to the Nom Com, working groups or other bodies is that no one
> nation can speak or act on behalf of another sovereign nation.  Hence, even
> if there was a significant number of GAC members in agreement with sending
> liaisons (and there is no evidence of that as far as I see) there is no
> current mechanism to effect what Westlake is suggesting.
>
>
>
> Otherwise, I am generally supportive of Chuck’s contributions and
> recommend that they be carefully considered vis-à-vis incorporating the
> corrections/clarifications in the final draft.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> RA
>
>
>
>
>
> *PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS*: DELETE randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; *REPLACE
> WITH: RA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <RA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*
>
>
>
> *Ron Andruff*
>
> *ONR Consulting, Inc.*
>
> *www.ICANNSherpa.com <http://www.icannsherpa.com/> *
>
> *(+1) 917 770-2693 <%28%2B1%29%20917%20770-2693>*
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Larisa B. Gurnick
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 17, 2015 14:47
> *To:* gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March
>
>
>
> Dear members of the GNSO Review Working Party,
>
> Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments and feedback  on
> Westlake’s Working Text.  If you have not had a chance to provide your
> comments yet, please do so by the deadline of *20 March*.  Please refer
> to Jen Wolfe’s email below for updates on the timeline.
>
>
>
> There are several options for your convenience to send your comments:
>
> ·         Post your comments on the wiki
> <https://community.icann.org/x/LQYnAw> (comments are organized by section
> of the working text)
>
> ·         Email your comments to the list (gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx)
>
> ·         Email your comments via redline edits or notes within the
> attached document.  Please send your email to the list (
> gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx)
>
>
>
> You can view written comments provided so far on the wiki
> <https://community.icann.org/x/LQYnAw>, listen to the recording
> <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-03mar15-en.mp3> from the 3 March
> working session, or read the transcript
> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48337497/Transcript%20GNSO%20review%2003%20March%202015.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1426185135000&api=v2>
> from that meeting.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Larisa
>
>
>
> *Larisa B. Gurnick*
>
> Director, Strategic Initiatives
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx
>
> 310 383-8995
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:48 AM
> *To:* gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx);
> Glen de Saint Géry
> *Subject:* Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline
>
>
>
> Dear GNSO Review Working Party,
>
>
>
> Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide
> initial feedback to the Westlake team last week.   You diligence in
> reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated!
>
>
>
> To address concerns regarding the timeline,  we have worked with Staff and
> Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps.  I have attached a Word
> document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a
> graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns.
>
>
>
> *Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March
> 20th*, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising
> their report.  You can send this through the list or post on the wiki.  All
> comments will be provided to Westlake.
>
>
>
> When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to
> be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they *do not*
> take incorporate into their report.  The next version will be provided as
> Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th.  Please note dates for subsequent
> calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached
> timeline and schedule.
>
>
>
> I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to
> gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way.  I look forward to
> continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback.  I wish you all a
> Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB*
>
> Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
>
> *513.746.2800 x 1 <513.746.2800%20x%201> or Cell 513.238.4348
> <513.238.4348>*
>
> *IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014*
>
> What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P
>
> Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc
>
> Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP
>
> Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM
>
>
>

Attachment: IPC Comments on Working Text from Westlake Group.docx
Description: Microsoft Office