RE: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March

[Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Mike, we will make sure these are incorporated.

jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348
IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014
What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P
Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc
Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP
Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM

From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 7:29 PM
To: Ron Andruff
Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March

With apologies for the slight delay over the weekend, the IPC's initial 
comments on the Working Text are attached.  Please let me know any questions.

Thanks,
Mike

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
http://rodenbaugh.com

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Ron Andruff 
<RA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:RA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dear all,

First, please allow me to express my apologies for dropping off of this 
discussion group pre-Singapore due to too much on my plate.  I believe that 
Steve Coates and perhaps one other BC member have joined in replacement.

Notwithstanding stepping back, I was just going through Chuck’s comments on the 
draft working text and wanted to also weigh-in on the following:


1.    From our research, we understand the NCUC, NPOC and NCSG membership lists 
are publicly available. The following SGs/Cs do not make membership information 
publicly available:
• The RrSG and RySG  • IPC  • ISCPC and BC

The BC membership list is the first thing noted on our web site, right above 
our Charter: http://www.bizconst.org/members/


2.    That the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on Early Engagement continue its two 
work streams as priority projects. As a part of its work it should consider how 
the GAC could appoint a liaison (non-voting) to each GNSO PDP WG as a means of 
providing timely non-binding input.


Having been actively engaged in discussions for one (or more) GAC members to 
join the Nominating Committee, the issues govenrments face in providing 
liaisons to the Nom Com, working groups or other bodies is that no one nation 
can speak or act on behalf of another sovereign nation.  Hence, even if there 
was a significant number of GAC members in agreement with sending liaisons (and 
there is no evidence of that as far as I see) there is no current mechanism to 
effect what Westlake is suggesting.

Otherwise, I am generally supportive of Chuck’s contributions and recommend 
that they be carefully considered vis-à-vis incorporating the 
corrections/clarifications in the final draft.

Thank you.

Kind regards,

RA


PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: DELETE 
randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; REPLACE WITH: 
RA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:RA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Ron Andruff
ONR Consulting, Inc.
www.ICANNSherpa.com<http://www.icannsherpa.com/>
(+1) 917 770-2693<tel:%28%2B1%29%20917%20770-2693>

From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>] 
On Behalf Of Larisa B. Gurnick
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 14:47
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March

Dear members of the GNSO Review Working Party,
Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments and feedback  on 
Westlake’s Working Text.  If you have not had a chance to provide your comments 
yet, please do so by the deadline of 20 March.  Please refer to Jen Wolfe’s 
email below for updates on the timeline.

There are several options for your convenience to send your comments:

•         Post your comments on the wiki<https://community.icann.org/x/LQYnAw> 
(comments are organized by section of the working text)

•         Email your comments to the list 
(gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>)

•         Email your comments via redline edits or notes within the attached 
document.  Please send your email to the list 
(gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>)

You can view written comments provided so far on the 
wiki<https://community.icann.org/x/LQYnAw>, listen to the 
recording<http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-03mar15-en.mp3> from the 3 
March working session, or read the 
transcript<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48337497/Transcript%20GNSO%20review%2003%20March%202015.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1426185135000&api=v2>
 from that meeting.

Thank you,
Larisa

Larisa B. Gurnick
Director, Strategic Initiatives
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx>
310 383-8995<tel:310%20383-8995>




From: Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:48 AM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson 
(jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>); Glen de 
Saint Géry
Subject: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline

Dear GNSO Review Working Party,

Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide 
initial feedback to the Westlake team last week.   You diligence in reviewing 
the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated!

To address concerns regarding the timeline,  we have worked with Staff and 
Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps.  I have attached a Word 
document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a 
graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns.

Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, 
so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report.  
You can send this through the list or post on the wiki.  All comments will be 
provided to Westlake.

When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be 
clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take 
incorporate into their report.  The next version will be provided as Draft 0 
and circulated on April 24th.  Please note dates for subsequent calls and 
meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and 
schedule.

I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather 
and provide feedback in a meaningful way.  I look forward to continuing to work 
with you and welcome your feedback.  I wish you all a Happy Spring and look 
forward to talking again in May!




[cid:image001.jpg@01D0660E.E9582E30]



jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
513.746.2800 x 1<tel:513.746.2800%20x%201> or Cell 
513.238.4348<tel:513.238.4348>
IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014
What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P
Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc
Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP
Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM