<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Updated Single and Two-character report
- To: "Patrick Jones" <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO RN WG" <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Updated Single and Two-character report
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:05:40 -0400
That will work Patrick. I am just getting ready to start doing a
comprehensive review of the Geographical/Geopolitical report.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patrick Jones
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7:54 PM
To: 'GNSO RN WG'
Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Updated Single and Two-character
report
Chuck,
With regard to the first sentence in Section 3, this was an
oversight and the sentence should probably be deleted.
The tables can be numbered 3.x. The recommendations were cut &
paste from Section 3.1-6 above. I can clean up the recommendations and
recirculate, but will have to do it from home this evening. It will be a
few hours before I can get to this, but can do so this evening.
Patrick
________________________________
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:48 PM
To: Patrick Jones; GNSO RN WG
Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Updated Single and Two-character
report
Patrick,
Was it the subgroup's intent to leave the first sentence of
section 3 in the report: "Expert consultations are ongoing and further
draft straw recommendations are in development by the Sub Group." In
other words, is the subgroup continuing to work regardless of whether we
get an extension from the Council?
It would really be helpful if the recommendation section could
be cleaned up. The tables should be numbered 3.x. In some cases there
are IDN recommendations and in others not, unless I am missing
something. In Table 4.2 the first row is Top/ASCII but the
recommendation mentions IDN and do you mean ASCII letters for that row.
etc.
If one of you could do a clean-up of this section, it would
really help.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patrick Jones
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7:22 PM
To: 'GNSO RN WG'
Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] Updated Single and Two-character
report
As the result of the subgroup's call this afternoon,
attached is the latest version of the single and two-character report.
This draft reflects the language agreed to this evening by the subgroup
members. Any subgroup members that want to provide minority positions
should provide those statements to Tim Denton for inclusion in the WG
report. Tables for the recommendations have been added. I have attached
redline and clean versions of the report.
Patrick
Patrick L. Jones
Registry Liaison Manager
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel: +1 310 301 3861
Fax: +1 310 823 8649
patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|