<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-rn-wg] gTLD Reserved Names Chart
- To: Ray Fassett <ray@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] gTLD Reserved Names Chart
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 10:04:23 -0700
<div>
Ray, that argument goes both ways. What is the rationale for maintaining
the status quo? In fact, there is no status quo. This requirement does not
affect .com, larger than all other gTLDs combined. Evidence needs to be
presented to justify this requirement. I don't believe there is any.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
However, the fact that these registrations exist in .com and the history
we have to date regarding them IS evidence that there is no apparent adverse
affect. And the fact that EmployMedia, NeuLevel, Afilias, Tralliance, and so on
saw no problem applying for strings, and getting those strings approved, that
were in current use at the second level for .com IS evidence as well.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
Bottom line, the evidence that does exist supports removing the
requirement. There is no evidence that maintaining it and creating further
burden on ICANN, prospective registrants, and subsequent gTLD applicants makes
any kind of sense whatsoever.</div>
<div><BR><BR>Tim <BR></div>
<div name="wmMessageComp"><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px
solid" webmail="1">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE:
[gnso-rn-wg] gTLD Reserved Names Chart<BR>From: "Ray Fassett"
<ray@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Date: Thu, May 03, 2007 11:49 am<BR>To: "'Patrick
Jones'" <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx><BR><BR>
<STYLE>
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</STYLE>
<o:SmartTagType name="PersonName"
namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"></o:SmartTagType>
<STYLE>
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage st1\:* {behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</STYLE>
<STYLE>
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage /* Font Definitions */ @font-face
{font-family:Wingdings; panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4
3 5 4 4 2 4;}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, #wmMessageComp
#wmMessage li.MsoNormal, #wmMessageComp #wmMessage div.MsoNormal {margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage a:link, #wmMessageComp #wmMessage span.MsoHyperlink
{color:black; text-decoration:underline;}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage a:visited, #wmMessageComp #wmMessage
span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:black; text-decoration:underline;}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Arial; color:windowtext;}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage span.EmailStyle18 {mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Arial; color:windowtext;}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage span.EmailStyle19 {mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Arial; color:windowtext;}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage span.EmailStyle20 {mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Arial; color:navy;}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage span.EmailStyle21 {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Arial; color:navy;}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in
1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
#wmMessageComp #wmMessage div.Section1 {page:Section1;}
</STYLE>
<DIV class=Section1>
<div><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR:
navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
Patrick, as you know, another member of our own 3 person sub-group has
opinioned just the opposite - and it’s not me </SPAN></FONT><FONT
face=Wingdings color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy;
FONT-FAMILY: Wingdings">J</SPAN></FONT><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
Opinions are great and welcome and important, but when there are
conflicting opinions – whether in or outside the sub-group (really does
not matter) – evidence needs to be presented so that an objective
conclusion can be reached. And, we have to appreciate that the status quo
is a certain way right now (i.e. a managed list). So, if the opinion is
to change the status quo, it (in my view) is going to have to require more than
just opinion. It’s a good point you are making and thank you for
mentioning it.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<div><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR:
navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<div><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR:
navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Ray<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<div><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR:
navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<div><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR:
navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><FONT face="Times
New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<HR tabIndex=-1 align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<div><B><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">From:</SPAN></FONT></B><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">
owner-<st1:PersonName w:st="on">gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx</st1:PersonName>
[mailto:owner-<st1:PersonName w:st="on">gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx</st1:PersonName>]
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">On Behalf Of </SPAN></B>Patrick
Jones<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Thursday, May 03,
2007 11:36 AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B>
<st1:PersonName w:st="on">gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx</st1:PersonName><BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> RE: [gnso-rn-wg] gTLD Reserved
Names Chart</SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></div></DIV>
<div><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
12pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<div><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR:
navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
We should discuss this in the call today. I am still concerned that
leaving the requirement (to reserve gTLD strings at the second level) in its
present form will become very difficult to manage as new gTLDs are added in the
future. <o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<div><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR:
navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<div><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR:
navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Patrick<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<div><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR:
navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><FONT face="Times
New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<HR tabIndex=-1 align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<div><B><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">From:</SPAN></FONT></B><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">
owner-<st1:PersonName w:st="on">gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx</st1:PersonName>
[mailto:owner-<st1:PersonName w:st="on">gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx</st1:PersonName>]
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">On Behalf Of </SPAN></B>Tim Ruiz<BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Thursday, May 03, 2007 8:29
AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> Ray Fassett<BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc:</SPAN></B> <st1:PersonName
w:st="on">gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx</st1:PersonName><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT:
bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> RE: [gnso-rn-wg] gTLD Reserved Names
Chart</SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></div></DIV>
<div><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
12pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></div>
<DIV>
<div><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
If this is going to be the recommendation, then I would like to add to
that the business names of then existing Accredited Registrars. And I am sure
that the IP community would then like to add the well known names of other
Internet services providers (search engines, ISPs, etc.,
etc.).<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div></DIV>
<DIV>
<div><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
12pt"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div></DIV>
<DIV>
<div><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
I cannot imagine a registry giving a competitor permission to register
the equivalent of its gTLD string at the second level. In fact, I think
investigation of antitrust and other anti-competitive laws and regulations
should be done before we consdier making such a
recommendation.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div></DIV>
<DIV>
<div><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
12pt"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div></DIV>
<DIV>
<div><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
What is the is actual evidence of potential harm to justify
this recommendation, or the existing policy regarding these reservations? What
is the justification to continue to expand the existing imbalance regarding the
registrations of such names? All this does is make an ever growing number
of valuable and useful generic strings unavailable to the general public, and
assumes bad intentions on the part of those who may like to use
them.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div></DIV>
<DIV>
<div><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
12pt"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div></DIV>
<DIV>
<div><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>Tim
<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></div></DIV>
<DIV name="wmMessageComp">
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR><BR><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">-------- Original Message
--------<BR>Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] gTLD Reserved Names Chart<BR>From: "Ray
Fassett" <<st1:PersonName
w:st="on">ray@xxxxxxxxx</st1:PersonName>><BR>Date: Wed, May 02, 2007 7:47
pm<BR>To: <<st1:PersonName
w:st="on">gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx</st1:PersonName>><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<div><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
Attached find the gTLD Reserved Names Chart outlining the sub group
recommendation for discussion on
Thursday.<u1:p></u1:p></SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></div></DIV>
<DIV>
<div><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
Arial"><u1:p> </u1:p></SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></div></DIV>
<DIV>
<div><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
Arial">Ray
Fassett<u1:p></u1:p></SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></div></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|