RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Single letter/single digit combinations at the top level

["Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Patrick: a 'nit'. I think is it combinations of single letter, single digit
TLDS. etc. 

 

Thanks for the reference to RFC 1123. I'd suggest that be added to the 'can
you just confirm your perspective' email to Bellovin and McFadden. they can
then chose whether they want to respond on this topic. 

 

Marilyn 

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Patrick Jones
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:33 PM
To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] Single letter/single digit combinations at the top
level

 

I am updating the subgroup report, and wanted to capture our discussion from
yesterday on single letter/single digit combinations at the top level
(examples include .3f, .a1, .u7). RFC 1123 should remove the question on
ordering, so is our recommendation now something along the lines of
"Applications may be considered for single letter, single digit TLDs in
accordance with the new gTLD process."

 

Patrick L. Jones

Registry Liaison Manager

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330

Marina del Rey, CA 90292

Tel: +1 310 301 3861

Fax: +1 310 823 8649

patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx