ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

FW: FW: [gnso-sl-wg] two of the assigned drafts are attached

  • To: <gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: FW: FW: [gnso-sl-wg] two of the assigned drafts are attached
  • From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:10:24 -0700

Thx Marilyn and Neal for these drafts.  My comments and suggested edits
are redlined in the attached.


Mike Rodenbaugh

Sr. Legal Director

Yahoo! Inc.


NOTICE:  This communication is confidential and may be protected by
attorney-client and/or work product privilege.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify me by reply, and delete this
communication and any attachments.


From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Marilyn Cade
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:13 PM
To: GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: FW: [gnso-sl-wg] two of the assigned drafts are attached


I have attached my draft assignment of a draft for Recommendation 6, and
also attached Neal Blair's draft for Recommendation Seven. Both the
recommendations were rewritten to be consistent with the draft
recommendations from Patrick's summary chart on page 6,and then fleshed
out, per the outline. 

Neal is traveling. I am not sure if he is going to be able to be on the
call in person. I am familiar with his section and can walk through it
if he is held up. 

He also asked that I ask the group how it was intended to deal with '-',
which was discussed with the two technical experts last week, but isn't
documented, except in the transcript. I reviewed the transcript, and
since it was Avri's question, wondered if she might want to ensure that
the discussion is captured in the body of the report in some way, or
footnoted on the recommendations page, or included in  the write up on

I did send both of these drafts off to Steve Bellovin and Mark McFadden
and asked them to advise if these recommendations capture their 'advice'
during the technical call. I am not sure how best to capture the
description of both, since they were  not 'technical experts', but are
offering their comments informally, during a conference call. I have
accordingly described it as an interactive consultation. 

Finally, it seems a pretty big waste of time to try to have an agreed
document from my working notes.  I am not sure how they fit into the
report, in any case. Perhaps both the original, and Mike Rodenbaugh's
suggested 'deletes' should just be part of the archives of emails. I
think that is the usual treatment of contributions to email lists at

And, given the amount of work that still remains, that seems a better
use of everyone's time. 






        From: "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
        To: <gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
        Subject: FW: [gnso-sl-wg] Updated Single and Two Character
Labels Subgroup Report
        Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:56:31 -0400

        Just a reminder that we all have assignments to revise parts of
the subgroup report.  According to my notes, which may not be entirely
trustworthy, these are as follows (using the recommendation numbers in
the revised document -- attached):


        4.  Single letters at the Top Level -- Greg

        5.  Single letters and digits at the second level -- Avri

        6.  Single and Two Digits at the top level -- Marilyn

        7.  Single Letter/Single Digit Combinations at the Top Level --

        8.  Two Letters at the top level -- Alistair

        9.  Any Combination of Two Letters and Digits at the Second
Level -- revision not needed


        Revision of Marilyn's Summary Report of Technical Experts Call
-- Mike


        Please correct any faulty notes/recollections I have.


        We have our next call Monday at 4:30 EDT (details circulated).
It would be good to have revisions (in track changes) circulated with
enough time to review before the call so we can discuss on the call.


        Talk to you all Monday!





        From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patrick Jones
        Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 12:43 AM
        To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Cc: 'Tina Dam'; ck@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Gomes, Chuck'; 'Liz Williams'
        Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] Updated Single and Two Character Labels
Subgroup Report

        As discussed earlier in the week, I have attached an updated
single and two character labels subgroup report. I ran into problems
with the latest template, so it remains a bit of a hybrid, but I wanted
to make sure that an update went out to the subgroup that included
materials on the definition of character and single and two character
IDNs. I plan to add to the IDN section tomorrow morning.


        I want to thank Tina and Cary for their input and editing to my
initial drafting on the definition of character over the past two weeks.
The section is the result of inquiries to Michael Everson and Cary as
experts and substantial guidance and suggestions from Cary and Tina. I
think the definition should provide assistance to the new gTLD process.


        I have updated the definitions table and the recommendations
table (although this may still need some tweaking). The recommendation
sections, except for definition of character and single and two
character IDNs, are essential the same as the previous draft (which was
a cut & paste from the 19 March 2007 RN WG Report). I have added back in
the section on symbols, based on Chuck's instructions from yesterday's
full WG call.


        I still need to update the sections with references to the GAC
Principles on New gTLDs and where relevant, the IDN WG Outcomes Report.
I'll complete that tomorrow. I can't look at this anymore tonight.


        If you want to update sections, or if I have left out new
material, please let me know.


        Also let me know if you have questions. I'll be online again in
the morning.




        Patrick L. Jones

        Registry Liaison Manager

        Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

        4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330

        Marina del Rey, CA 90292

        Tel: +1 310 301 3861

        Fax: +1 310 823 8649




        ><< SubgroupRep1_2CharApr26.doc >> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy