[gnso-sl-wg] regarding Mike Rodenbaugh's suggested edits

["Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Mike and other colleagues, Thanks for your suggestions on the single
and two digits at the top level. 

 

As you know, on behalf of the Sub Group, I had already sent the earlier
draft off to the two technical experts, but after today's call, my plan was
to work with Greg and Patrick to send them the final draft version. My
proposed plan would be to add in your question about listing some of the
examples of the software applications when I recontact them with the updated
draft report. 

 

Regards, Marilyn Cade

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 10:10 PM
To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: FW: FW: [gnso-sl-wg] two of the assigned drafts are attached

 

Thx Marilyn and Neal for these drafts.  My comments and suggested edits are
redlined in the attached.

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

Sr. Legal Director

Yahoo! Inc.

 

NOTICE:  This communication is confidential and may be protected by
attorney-client and/or work product privilege.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify me by reply, and delete this communication and any
attachments.

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Marilyn Cade
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:13 PM
To: GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: FW: [gnso-sl-wg] two of the assigned drafts are attached

 


I have attached my draft assignment of a draft for Recommendation 6, and
also attached Neal Blair's draft for Recommendation Seven. Both the
recommendations were rewritten to be consistent with the draft
recommendations from Patrick's summary chart on page 6,and then fleshed out,
per the outline. 

Neal is traveling. I am not sure if he is going to be able to be on the call
in person. I am familiar with his section and can walk through it if he is
held up. 

He also asked that I ask the group how it was intended to deal with '-',
which was discussed with the two technical experts last week, but isn't
documented, except in the transcript. I reviewed the transcript, and since
it was Avri's question, wondered if she might want to ensure that the
discussion is captured in the body of the report in some way, or footnoted
on the recommendations page, or included in  the write up on 'symbols'. 

I did send both of these drafts off to Steve Bellovin and Mark McFadden and
asked them to advise if these recommendations capture their 'advice' during
the technical call. I am not sure how best to capture the description of
both, since they were  not 'technical experts', but are offering their
comments informally, during a conference call. I have accordingly described
it as an interactive consultation. 

Finally, it seems a pretty big waste of time to try to have an agreed
document from my working notes.  I am not sure how they fit into the report,
in any case. Perhaps both the original, and Mike Rodenbaugh's suggested
'deletes' should just be part of the archives of emails. I think that is the
usual treatment of contributions to email lists at ICANN. 

And, given the amount of work that still remains, that seems a better use of
everyone's time. 

Regards

 

Marilyn 

 


  _____  


From: "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: FW: [gnso-sl-wg] Updated Single and Two Character Labels Subgroup
Report
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:56:31 -0400

Just a reminder that we all have assignments to revise parts of the subgroup
report.  According to my notes, which may not be entirely trustworthy, these
are as follows (using the recommendation numbers in the revised document --
attached):

 

4.  Single letters at the Top Level -- Greg

5.  Single letters and digits at the second level -- Avri

6.  Single and Two Digits at the top level -- Marilyn

7.  Single Letter/Single Digit Combinations at the Top Level -- Neil

8.  Two Letters at the top level -- Alistair

9.  Any Combination of Two Letters and Digits at the Second Level --
revision not needed

 

Revision of Marilyn's Summary Report of Technical Experts Call -- Mike

 

Please correct any faulty notes/recollections I have.

 

We have our next call Monday at 4:30 EDT (details circulated). It would be
good to have revisions (in track changes) circulated with enough time to
review before the call so we can discuss on the call.

 

Talk to you all Monday!

 

Greg

 


  _____  


From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Patrick Jones
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 12:43 AM
To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Tina Dam'; ck@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Gomes, Chuck'; 'Liz Williams'
Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] Updated Single and Two Character Labels Subgroup
Report

As discussed earlier in the week, I have attached an updated single and two
character labels subgroup report. I ran into problems with the latest
template, so it remains a bit of a hybrid, but I wanted to make sure that an
update went out to the subgroup that included materials on the definition of
character and single and two character IDNs. I plan to add to the IDN
section tomorrow morning.

 

I want to thank Tina and Cary for their input and editing to my initial
drafting on the definition of character over the past two weeks. The section
is the result of inquiries to Michael Everson and Cary as experts and
substantial guidance and suggestions from Cary and Tina. I think the
definition should provide assistance to the new gTLD process.

 

I have updated the definitions table and the recommendations table (although
this may still need some tweaking). The recommendation sections, except for
definition of character and single and two character IDNs, are essential the
same as the previous draft (which was a cut & paste from the 19 March 2007
RN WG Report). I have added back in the section on symbols, based on Chuck's
instructions from yesterday's full WG call.

 

I still need to update the sections with references to the GAC Principles on
New gTLDs and where relevant, the IDN WG Outcomes Report. I'll complete that
tomorrow. I can't look at this anymore tonight.

 

If you want to update sections, or if I have left out new material, please
let me know.

 

Also let me know if you have questions. I'll be online again in the morning.

 

Patrick

 

Patrick L. Jones

Registry Liaison Manager

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330

Marina del Rey, CA 90292

Tel: +1 310 301 3861

Fax: +1 310 823 8649

patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx 

 

 

><< SubgroupRep1_2CharApr26.doc >>