<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Single and Two Character SG Report
- To: "'Mike Rodenbaugh'" <mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Single and Two Character SG Report
- From: "Patrick Jones" <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:15:33 -0700
Even though the email came from Chris Disspain, it was in his capacity as
Chair of the ccNSO. I am fine with adding that clarification, "the subgroup
was encouraged by the Chair of the ccNSO...". Are there any objections to
this edit?
Patrick
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 12:01 PM
To: patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-sl-wg] Single and Two Character SG Report
Thx Patrick. I think "encouraged" is wrong verb in fn 2 and that it was
from Disspain and not the ccnso.
Mike Rodenbaugh
Sr. Legal Director
Yahoo! Inc.
NOTE: This email may be protected by attorney client and/or work product
privilege. If you are not intended recipient then please delete and notify
me promptly.
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Jones <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mike Rodenbaugh; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue May 08 11:25:49 2007
Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Single and Two Character SG Report
Mike,
Thanks for your quick turn-around on the edits. I am fine with all, except
for the edit to footnote 2. The sentence you suggested deleting was approved
by the majority of the SG and full WG in the March 19 report.
As for footnote 3, I have definite thoughts on what it means, but we as a SG
do not need to tackle that issue because it will be resolved on a case by
case basis depending on the registry requesting release.
Patrick
_____
From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:14 AM
To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: FW: [gnso-sl-wg] Single and Two Character SG Report
Patrick, thanks a million more times for all the great work you have put
into this. Thanks also to Greg, Marilyn and the rest of the subgroup who
have labored on this more than me the last 30 days.
I have just a few suggested edits to the Recos and footnotes, primarily
based on the notion that we are not 'continuing' reservations as we have not
found any requirement for them to date -- so essentially we are creating
reservations and not continuing them.
I also delete my minority stmt re IDNs as the WG has essentially adopted it.
I modify my minority statement re ccTLDs.
Lmk any questions.
Mike Rodenbaugh
Sr. Legal Director
Yahoo! Inc.
NOTICE: This communication is confidential and may be protected by
attorney-client and/or work product privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify me by reply, and delete this communication and any
attachments.
_____
From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Patrick Jones
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:50 AM
To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Liz Williams'; 'Gomes, Chuck'
Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] Single and Two Character SG Report
Here is the latest version of the SG report. I have inserted hyperlinks to
bios for the technical experts consulted on the various categories and made
the other changes discussed yesterday. I'll give until around 1pm today for
out technical experts to respond to Marilyn's previous email. After that, we
should probably forward the clean version of the SG report to the full
Working Group.
Patrick
Patrick L. Jones
Registry Liaison Manager
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel: +1 310 301 3861
Fax: +1 310 823 8649
patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|