Re: [gnso-sti] Brainstorming Notes

["Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree that would help with the discussions.



                                       
Sincerely,

Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com


*** This Message Has Been Sent Using BlackBerry Internet Service from Mobilink 
***

-----Original Message-----
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:36:44 
To: Margie Milam<Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>; Nevett, 
Jonathon<jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Brainstorming Notes

Margie,

 

Can you please do this in an Excel format?  I would like to be able to
insert a column that includes the IRT rationale (from my perspective).
I think the chart is a great start, but I think without understanding
why the IRT did what it did, the chart is a little incomplete.  I am not
saying that the STI should adopt the IRT rationale at all, but everyone
should have the benefit of understanding why we did what we did when
they weigh the pros and cons of what staff did.

Thanks!

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy



________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.

 

 

From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 6:36 PM
To: Nevett, Jonathon; gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Brainstorming Notes

 

Dear All,

 

I am working on  a more detailed analysis, per Jon's suggestion,  but
drafted the attached document for our discussion tomorrow, which
consolidates the brainstorming notes from our pre-meeting last week,
with the IRT recommendations, and Staff recommendations.

 

Please let me know if this format is helpful, and if so, what additional
information would be useful to you.

 

Best Regards,

 

Margie Milam

Senior Policy Counselor

ICANN

 

 

 

From: Nevett, Jonathon [mailto:jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 8:01 AM
To: Margie Milam; gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Brainstorming Notes

 

Margie:

 

I'm not sure if you were planning to or not, but I, for one, think that
it would be great if staff would circulate a chart listing each issue
from the notes, the IRT recommendation, the staff recommendation, other
key recommendations (e.g. WIPO, NCUC), and in the case of the URS a
column for the UDRP .  I think it would be very helpful information for
the group and would help to streamline the discussions at this week's
meetings.  I know we discussed the concept of a chart at the pre-meeting
over the weekend in Seoul, so I hope it is in the works.  

 

Thanks.  

 

Jon

 

 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:17 PM
To: gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-sti] Brainstorming Notes

 

Dear All,

 

Please find attached the Brainstorming Notes developed during our
meeting yesterday.  

 

Best Regards,

 

Margie Milam

Senior Policy Counselor

ICANN