| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 RE: [gnso-sti] Brainstorming Notes
To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>,        Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>,        "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,        "gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Brainstorming NotesFrom: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:21:37 -0500 
 
Perhaps even knowing why the staff did what they did could help! Alan
At 03/11/2009 08:36 PM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
 
Margie,
Can you please do this in an Excel format?  I would like to be able 
to insert a column that includes the IRT rationale (from my 
perspective).  I think the chart is a great start, but I think 
without understanding why the IRT did what it did, the chart is a 
little incomplete.  I am not saying that the STI should adopt the 
IRT rationale at all, but everyone should have the benefit of 
understanding why we did what we did when they weigh the pros and 
cons of what staff did. 
Thanks!
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only 
for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error 
and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the 
original message. 
From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Margie Milam 
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 6:36 PM
To: Nevett, Jonathon; gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Brainstorming Notes
Dear All,
I am working on  a more detailed analysis, per Jon's 
suggestion,  but drafted the attached document for our discussion 
tomorrow, which consolidates the brainstorming notes from our 
pre-meeting last week, with the IRT recommendations, and Staff recommendations. 
Please let me know if this format is helpful, and if so, what 
additional information would be useful to you. 
Best Regards,
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
From: Nevett, Jonathon [mailto:jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 8:01 AM
To: Margie Milam; gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Brainstorming Notes
Margie:
I'm not sure if you were planning to or not, but I, for one, think 
that it would be great if staff would circulate a chart listing each 
issue from the notes, the IRT recommendation, the staff 
recommendation, other key recommendations (e.g. WIPO, NCUC), and in 
the case of the URS a column for the UDRP .  I think it would be 
very helpful information for the group and would help to streamline 
the discussions at this week's meetings.  I know we discussed the 
concept of a chart at the pre-meeting over the weekend in Seoul, so 
I hope it is in the works. 
Thanks.
Jon
----------
From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Margie Milam 
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:17 PM
To: gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-sti] Brainstorming Notes
Dear All,
Please find attached the Brainstorming Notes developed during our 
meeting yesterday. 
Best Regards,
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |