Re: [gnso-sti] URS Strawman Proposal 111109.xls

[Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx>]

David, John and team:

I hope you find the attached staff comments on the URS Strawman useful and not 
intrusive. We will be available to answer questions on the call.

Regards,

Kurt


On 11/11/09 8:00 AM, "Jonathon Nevett" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

STI Team:

Attached is an attempt at a strawman proposal on the key URS issues raised at 
our meetings.  Not everyone will agree with every tenet of the compromise, but 
it is an attempt to do just that  . . . reach a compromise.  In some instances, 
principles are proposed, but details are left to staff to implement.  This is 
appropriate for a number of reasons, not the least of which is our timing.

Thanks to Zahid and Kathy and the others who paved the way with the consensus 
document.  Also, thanks to Margie who -- per yesterday's conversation -- helped 
prepare parts of the chart.

Finally, I offer this up neither as a representative of the Registrar 
Stakeholder Group nor of Network Solutions.

I very much look forward to continuing the discussions with the team on these 
issues.  I hope that we can reach consensus and improve upon the ICANN 
proposals.

Best,

Jon

Attachment: URS Strawman-staff comment.doc
Description: URS Strawman-staff comment.doc