Re: [gnso-sti] FW: URS Comment Re Appeal

["Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

The BC supports these points.



                                       
Sincerely,

Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com


*** This Message Has Been Sent Using BlackBerry Internet Service from Mobilink 
***

-----Original Message-----
From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:59:32 
To: 'GNSO STI'<gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-sti] FW: URS Comment Re Appeal

Fyi-

From: Mark V. B. Partridge [mailto:mvbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 10:27 AM
To: Margie Milam
Subject: Fwd: URS Comment Re Appeal

Please circulate this to the STI list.  For some reason I can't determine my 
messages to the list do not seem to get through.  Thanks.  Mark


***************************************************************************
The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential information 
protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. You may not forward this 
message or any attachments without the permission of the sender. If you believe 
that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you 
received the message in error and then delete it. Nothing in this email 
message, including the typed name of the sender and/or this signature block, is 
intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to 
the contrary is included in the message.
***************************************************************************