| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 RE: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report
To: "gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Draft STI ReportFrom: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:16:37 -0500 
 
I have reviewed the suggested changes and have no problems other than 
the TC 5.1 - Most of these changes have received no discussion and I 
have trouble adding them into a section flagged as having unanimous 
consent. Moreover, much of what is there belongs in the registry 
agreement and not in the spec of the TC. 
Alan
At 07/12/2009 08:39 AM, McGradyP@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
 
Margie,
Attached is a comparison version showing the IPC's comments to the 
draft report.  We believe these comments are clarifying in nature 
and do not expect that they would be controversial.  I will be in 
transit most of today, so if you have any specific questions, please 
reach out to Mark.  Thanks! 
Regards,
Paul
 
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |