<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report
- To: "gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:16:37 -0500
I have reviewed the suggested changes and have no problems other than
the TC 5.1 - Most of these changes have received no discussion and I
have trouble adding them into a section flagged as having unanimous
consent. Moreover, much of what is there belongs in the registry
agreement and not in the spec of the TC.
Alan
At 07/12/2009 08:39 AM, McGradyP@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Margie,
Attached is a comparison version showing the IPC's comments to the
draft report. We believe these comments are clarifying in nature
and do not expect that they would be controversial. I will be in
transit most of today, so if you have any specific questions, please
reach out to Mark. Thanks!
Regards,
Paul
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|