Re: [gnso-sti] Revised STI-WT Report v5
Great tx to Margie for a report that truly reflects the diversity of edits and views discussed in our call yesterday!
Two small edits:1) In URS 8.1, per the language Mark and I circulated, the parenthetical phrase (default or contested) was deleted. Some felt it might cause possible confusion with the separate default answer. ==> 8.1 After a decision in any case, either party should have a right to seek a de novo appeal based* **on the existing record *within the URS process for a reasonable fee to cover the costs of the appeal....
2) I would like to see the IRT footnote, #4, for TC section 5.1, reference the specific IRT Report Section being discussed, namely Section 6, Standard Sunrise Registration Process ==> 4. Please refer to the IRT Report posted at http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/irt-final-report-trademark-protection-29may09-en.pdf, Section 6, Standard Sunrise Registration Process.
Happy Holidays All! Kathy
Dear All,Attached is the revised STI Report that incorporates Alan's comments and includes the Board Letter in Annex 1. I did not receive any other comments to the report, so I assume that the content is now final, subject to any typos or grammatical error corrections that may be identified.I am expecting the BC Minority Position for inclusion into the Report by early next morning. Please let me know if I should expect any other minority positions to be completed by tomorrow morning. Once I receive it, I will include it into the Final Report and convert the document into a PDP for circulation to the Council by David Maher, or if David prefers, I can send it directly to the Council.Best Regards,Margie_____________Margie Milam Senior Policy Counselor ICANN ____________