ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report

  • To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx PDP DT" <Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:27:16 -0700

<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000; 
font-size:10pt;"><div>Thanks Mikey,</div>
<div>Sorry I haven't been able to make the calls, one thing or another has come 
up. I think the current draft and changes look good but I do have one 
<div>It seems to assumes if all regitries are thick that registrars will still 
be required to maintain a set of WHOIS data themselves. However, if the 
registries are all thick and authoritative for WHOIS data then I see no reason 
why a registrar should continue to be required to maintain a duplicate set of 
the data, especially since it will also be escrowed by the registry.&nbsp;I 
would think a number of registrars&nbsp;would find it useful and cost effective 
to simply use&nbsp;a registry's&nbsp;authoritative&nbsp;data instead of trying 
to maintain it themselves. And I&nbsp;can easily see an effort by registrars 
to&nbsp;change the RAA and/or policies to reflect that.<BR></div>
<div>So I don't think the PDP group should assume that both registrars and 
registries&nbsp;will continue to&nbsp;maintain the data. It may be good to note 
that possibility. Or alternatively, that may be a question they want to 
consider. I don't think it would necessarily be out of scope since it is 
tightly associated with whether all registries are thick or not, but others may 
have a different opinion.<BR></div>
verdana; COLOR: black; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=replyBlockquote 
<DIV id=wmQuoteWrapper>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: 
[gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report<BR>From: "Mike O'Connor" &lt;<a 
href="mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx";>mike@xxxxxxxxxx</a>&gt;<BR>Date: Sat, September 
22, 2012 10:03 am<BR>To: "<a 
href="mailto:Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx";>Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx</a> PDP 
 all,<BR><BR>here's the status report for this week. i *think* we're wringing 
out the last issues in the draft. so this would be a good time to take a look 
at the latest version. what seems to be working well is to run your ideas 
through the list so then we can work through them on the call. here's a link to 
the draft i pushed out after the last call.<BR><BR><a 
 here's the status report. i'm hoping we can get to a draft we can push out for 
a consensus call by the end of the meeting on Thursday. 
<BR><BR>- - - - - - - - -<BR>phone 651-647-6109 <BR>fax 866-280-2356 <BR>web <a 
href="http://www.haven2.com";>http://www.haven2.com</a><BR>handle OConnorStP (ID 
for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy