Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report

[Frédéric Guillemaut <fg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello

I agree :
Getting rid of the obligation to maintain a whois server would be 
interesting to some registrars.
Some might want to keep it and should be able to do it.


But maintaining two sets of data should not be mandatory.

Best regards

frederic


Le 24/09/2012 18:27, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
> Thanks Mikey,
> Sorry I haven't been able to make the calls, one thing or another has
> come up. I think the current draft and changes look good but I do have
> one comment/concern.
> It seems to assumes if all regitries are thick that registrars will
> still be required to maintain a set of WHOIS data themselves. However,
> if the registries are all thick and authoritative for WHOIS data then I
> see no reason why a registrar should continue to be required to maintain
> a duplicate set of the data, especially since it will also be escrowed
> by the registry. I would think a number of registrars would find it
> useful and cost effective to simply use a registry's authoritative data
> instead of trying to maintain it themselves. And I can easily see an
> effort by registrars to change the RAA and/or policies to reflect that.
> So I don't think the PDP group should assume that both registrars and
> registries will continue to maintain the data. It may be good to note
> that possibility. Or alternatively, that may be a question they want to
> consider. I don't think it would necessarily be out of scope since it is
> tightly associated with whether all registries are thick or not, but
> others may have a different opinion.
> Best,
> Tim
>
>     -------- Original Message --------
>     Subject: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report
>     From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>>
>     Date: Sat, September 22, 2012 10:03 am
>     To: "Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx> PDP DT"
>     <Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
>
>     hi all,
>
>     here's the status report for this week. i *think* we're wringing out
>     the last issues in the draft. so this would be a good time to take a
>     look at the latest version. what seems to be working well is to run
>     your ideas through the list so then we can work through them on the
>     call. here's a link to the draft i pushed out after the last call.
>
>     http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-thickwhois-dt/doc3QzSkLIUIQ.doc
>
>     and here's the status report. i'm hoping we can get to a draft we
>     can push out for a consensus call by the end of the meeting on
>     Thursday.
>
>     thanks,
>
>     mikey
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>     - - - - - - - - -
>     phone 651-647-6109
>     fax 866-280-2356
>     web http://www.haven2.com
>     handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
>     Google, etc.)
--


Frédéric Guillemaut
fg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Tel : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07
COO

Mailclub
Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai
37, rue Guibal
13356 Marseille Cedex 03
www.mailclub.fr
Fax : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 20



IMPORTANT :
Pensez toujours à nous communiquer une adresse email valide tout au long 
de votre abonnement, l'email étant notre principal moyen de 
communication avec vous.
Si vous changez d'adresse email n'oubliez pas de modifier votre profil, 
accessible à partir de l'Espace Client.