Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report
Hello I agree :Getting rid of the obligation to maintain a whois server would be interesting to some registrars.
Some might want to keep it and should be able to do it. But maintaining two sets of data should not be mandatory. Best regards frederic Le 24/09/2012 18:27, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
Thanks Mikey, Sorry I haven't been able to make the calls, one thing or another has come up. I think the current draft and changes look good but I do have one comment/concern. It seems to assumes if all regitries are thick that registrars will still be required to maintain a set of WHOIS data themselves. However, if the registries are all thick and authoritative for WHOIS data then I see no reason why a registrar should continue to be required to maintain a duplicate set of the data, especially since it will also be escrowed by the registry. I would think a number of registrars would find it useful and cost effective to simply use a registry's authoritative data instead of trying to maintain it themselves. And I can easily see an effort by registrars to change the RAA and/or policies to reflect that. So I don't think the PDP group should assume that both registrars and registries will continue to maintain the data. It may be good to note that possibility. Or alternatively, that may be a question they want to consider. I don't think it would necessarily be out of scope since it is tightly associated with whether all registries are thick or not, but others may have a different opinion. Best, Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>> Date: Sat, September 22, 2012 10:03 am To: "Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx> PDP DT" <Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>> hi all, here's the status report for this week. i *think* we're wringing out the last issues in the draft. so this would be a good time to take a look at the latest version. what seems to be working well is to run your ideas through the list so then we can work through them on the call. here's a link to the draft i pushed out after the last call. http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-thickwhois-dt/doc3QzSkLIUIQ.doc and here's the status report. i'm hoping we can get to a draft we can push out for a consensus call by the end of the meeting on Thursday. thanks, mikey ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
-- Frédéric Guillemaut fg@xxxxxxxxxxx Tel : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 COO Mailclub Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai 37, rue Guibal 13356 Marseille Cedex 03 www.mailclub.fr Fax : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 20 IMPORTANT :Pensez toujours à nous communiquer une adresse email valide tout au long de votre abonnement, l'email étant notre principal moyen de communication avec vous. Si vous changez d'adresse email n'oubliez pas de modifier votre profil, accessible à partir de l'Espace Client.