<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-thickwhois-dt] MP3 / Thick WHOIS PDP Drafting Team - recording 27 September 2012 at 18:00 UTC
- To: Thick WHOIS PDP DT <Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] MP3 / Thick WHOIS PDP Drafting Team - recording 27 September 2012 at 18:00 UTC
- From: Gisella Gruber <Gisella.Gruber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:50:29 -0700
Dear All,
The next Thick WHOIS PDP Drafting Team call is scheduled at the same time next
week, Thursday 04 October 2012 at 1800 UTC.
Please find the MP3 recording of the Thick WHOIS PDP Drafting Team
teleconference held on Thursday 27 September 2012 at 1800 UTC at:
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-thick-whois-20120927-en.mp3
On page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/calendar/#sep<http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#aug>
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master
Calendar page
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
The adobe connect chat transcript is posted at the end of this email.
Attendees
Elisa Cooper - CBUC
Keith Drazek - RySG
Alan Greenberg - At-Large
Carolyn Hoover - RySG
Susan Kawaguchi - CBUC
Mikey O'Connor - ISPCP
Evan Leibovitch - At-Large
Jonathan Tenenbaum - RrSG
Ray Fassett - RySG
Ekaterina Dureva - Individual
ICANN Staff
Marika Konings
Barbara Roseman
Gisella Gruber
Apology:
Susan Prosser
Steve Metalitz
Jonathan Zuck
Carlton Samuels
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Gisella
Mailing list archives:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-thickwhois-dt/
Wiki page:
https://community.icann.org/x/whgQAg
Information on WHOIS can be found on page
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/thick-whois.htm
Participants subscribed to the drafting team
Wilson Abigaba - NCUC
Bob Bruen - NARALO ALS
Elisa Cooper - CBUC
Avri Doria - NCSG
Keith Drazek - RySG
Ekaterina Dureva - Individual
Ray Fassett - RySG
Alan Greenberg - At-Large
Volker Greimann - RrSG
Frédéric Guillemaut - RrSG
Tony Harris - ISPCP
Caroline Hoover - RySG
Susan Kawaguchi - CBUC
Evan Leibovitch - At-Large
Steve Metalitz - IPC
Mikey O'Connor - ISPCP
Susan Prosser - RrSG
Tim Ruiz - RrSG
Carlton Samuels - At-Large
Michael Shohat - RrSG
Jonathan Tenenbaum - RrSG
Brian Winterfeldt - IPC
Jonathan Zuck - IPC
Observers
Stephane van Gelder - RrSG
Jeff Neuman - RySG
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISPCP
******
Adobe Connect Chat Transcript:
Marika Konings:Welcome to the 'thick' Whois DT meeting of 27 September 2012
Barb Roseman:I'm on mute as I've got dogs at the house
Alan Greenberg:Sound MUCH better now
Gisella Gruber-White:Carolyn Hoover joined the audio bridge
Keith Drazek, Verisign:i didn't receive an attachment
Gisella Gruber-White:Evan Leibovitch joined the call
Evan Leibovitch:Howdy
Barb Roseman:would the word Primary be better than authoritative
Gisella Gruber-White:Ekaterina has disconnected - she is trying to reconnect
Keith Drazek, Verisign:authoritative defines whose data set takes precedent
if there's an inconsistency.
Carolyn Hoover:for .coop, most registrars point to our whois
Barb Roseman:+1 to keith
Keith Drazek, Verisign:i can try to findf out the answer to Alan's question
by reaching out to some registrars. I don't know the answer, but I suspect it's
a mix. Some relay the registry data and some rely on their own database.
Barb Roseman:which is different from the primary/secondary thing I was
pointing out
Ekaterina Dureva:Sorry, but I have internet issues, so I will watching though
adobe connect
Keith Drazek, Verisign:another issue around the question of whois data
authority is around proxy/privacy services. registrars who offer proxy/privacy
services typically (if not entirely) send the proxy data to the registry and
hold the actual registrant data themselves. how can the registry be
authoritative for registrant data that it never receives?
Alan Greenberg:I originally read this point with "uniform" being a synonym
for all thick instead of some thick and some thin.
Gisella Gruber-White:Jonathan Tenenbaum joined the call
Keith Drazek, Verisign:jeff's primary concern on this issue is the
equal/equitable treatment of competing registries. he feels that if the largest
registy isn't required to go thick, then those who are thick should be allowed
to go thin. i'm not advocating this one way or the other, but wanted to at
least expand on jeff's point a bit to make sure the intent was clear.
Ray Fassett (.JOBS):yes
Carolyn Hoover:remove the period
Keith Drazek, Verisign:if we're going to refer to the domain name status,
that would include lock. just use the word status instead of both.
Keith Drazek, Verisign:the biggest cost will be a result of the actual
transition.
Keith Drazek, Verisign:but there are ongoing cost implications of either
transition or no transition
Evan Leibovitch:Hey, I've tried to stay quiet to keep the call moving. I
haven't had much to add to the current discussion.
Carolyn Hoover:5 minutes is fine
Keith Drazek, Verisign:time flies when you're having fun
Keith Drazek, Verisign:i think we're getting close and should be able to make
the 9th
Ray Fassett (.JOBS):thanks Mikey
Evan Leibovitch:bye!
Ekaterina Dureva:bye
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|