<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report -- FINAL
- To: "Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx DT" <gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report -- FINAL
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:59:30 -0400
Hi,
If it is International Law, than why has this never been acted on in any
International court. There are certainly infringements in the incumbent gTLDs
(I haven't checked, I am just assuming) that could have been judged in
International tribunals. Certainly infringement of the RCRC movement symbols
on a battlefield would have been. Also, while the GAC can give valuable
advice, it is not an arbtrar of International Law. Nor does it make law.
I certainly think that the PDP should look into this seriously and I think the
pointer to .int policy is a very useful clue. But I also agree with Jeff, this
is an ICANN policy matter. In the absence in rulings by duly constituted
tribunals at the correct International level, it is for the muti-stakeholder
ICANN to develop and apply policy that meets the existing International
requirements to the best of our understanding.
I look forward to the WG.
avri
On 21 Oct 2012, at 17:14, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> I also think the exchanges last week were good. Regardless of outcome, it is
> good to see active participation.
>
> Regarding the GAC comment on PDP, since they explicitly suggested a
> moratorium on the IGO names, it sounds like they accept that a PDP is proper
> on those, but not on the RC/IOC names.
>
> Alan
>
> At 21/10/2012 04:34 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>
>> While I was tied up in ALAC stuff I'm happy to have seen the progress.
>>
>> I'm a little concerned by the GAC communiqué's end-of-the-meeting comment
>> that the PDP itself is pointless. Just wondering if the community may find
>> itself in a situation of needing to respond to this point, and how.
>>
>> On 21 October 2012 10:58, Hoover, Carolyn <CHoover@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Mikey. Participating has been much easier with you and Alan helping
>> with this process. Thanks for your work in moving this forward and making
>> sure all points were considered during the process.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Carolyn Hoover
>>
>>
>>
>> From: owner-gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx [
>> mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:19 AM
>> To: Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx DT
>> Subject: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report -- FINAL
>>
>>
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> here's the last weekly status report for our drafting team. yay!
>>
>>
>>
>> thanks to all -- i don't know about you but i had a great time, learned a
>> lot and thoroughly enjoyed the experience. in a conversation with Marika
>> after the GNSO meeting i volunteered to fill the "interim chair" slot on the
>> PDP and would be willing to chair the thing if the votes go my way.
>>
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> mikey
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Evan Leibovitch
>> Toronto Canada
>> Em: evan at telly dot org
>> Sk: evanleibovitch
>> Tw: el56
>>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|