ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-thickwhois-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report -- FINAL

  • To: "Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx DT" <gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report -- FINAL
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:59:30 -0400

Hi,

If it is International Law, than why has this never been acted on in any 
International court.  There are certainly infringements in the incumbent gTLDs 
(I haven't checked, I am just assuming) that could have been judged in 
International tribunals.  Certainly  infringement of the RCRC movement symbols 
on a battlefield would have been.  Also, while the GAC can give valuable 
advice, it is not an arbtrar of International Law. Nor does it make law.

I certainly think that the PDP should look into this seriously and I think the 
pointer to .int policy is a very useful clue. But I also agree with Jeff, this 
is an ICANN policy matter.  In the absence in rulings by duly constituted 
tribunals at the correct International level, it is for the muti-stakeholder 
ICANN to develop and apply policy that meets the existing International 
requirements to the best of our understanding.  

I look forward to the WG. 

avri

On 21 Oct 2012, at 17:14, Alan Greenberg wrote:

> I also think the exchanges last week were good. Regardless of outcome, it is 
> good to see active participation.
> 
> Regarding the GAC comment on PDP, since they explicitly suggested a 
> moratorium on the IGO names, it sounds like they accept that a PDP is proper 
> on those, but not on the RC/IOC names.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 21/10/2012 04:34 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> 
>> While I was tied up in ALAC stuff I'm happy to have seen the progress.
>> 
>> I'm a little concerned by the GAC communiqué's end-of-the-meeting comment 
>> that the PDP itself is pointless. Just wondering if the community may find 
>> itself in a situation of needing to respond to this point,  and how. 
>> 
>> On 21 October 2012 10:58, Hoover, Carolyn <CHoover@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks, Mikey.  Participating has been much easier with you and Alan helping 
>> with this process.  Thanks for your work in moving this forward and making 
>> sure all points were considered during the process.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> Carolyn Hoover
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: owner-gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx [ 
>> mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:19 AM
>> To: Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx DT
>> Subject: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report -- FINAL
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> hi all,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> here's the last weekly status report for our drafting team.  yay!  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> thanks to all -- i don't know about you but i had a great time, learned a 
>> lot and thoroughly enjoyed the experience.  in a conversation with Marika 
>> after the GNSO meeting i volunteered to fill the "interim chair" slot on the 
>> PDP and would be willing to chair the thing if the votes go my way.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Evan Leibovitch
>> Toronto Canada
>> Em: evan at telly dot org
>> Sk: evanleibovitch
>> Tw: el56
>> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy