ooops, Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report -- FINAL

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

wrong list.

avri

On 22 Oct 2012, at 01:59, Avri Doria wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> If it is International Law, than why has this never been acted on in any 
> International court.  There are certainly infringements in the incumbent 
> gTLDs (I haven't checked, I am just assuming) that could have been judged in 
> International tribunals.  Certainly  infringement of the RCRC movement 
> symbols on a battlefield would have been.  Also, while the GAC can give 
> valuable advice, it is not an arbtrar of International Law. Nor does it make 
> law.
> 
> I certainly think that the PDP should look into this seriously and I think 
> the pointer to .int policy is a very useful clue. But I also agree with Jeff, 
> this is an ICANN policy matter.  In the absence in rulings by duly 
> constituted tribunals at the correct International level, it is for the 
> muti-stakeholder ICANN to develop and apply policy that meets the existing 
> International requirements to the best of our understanding.  
> 
> I look forward to the WG. 
> 
> avri
> 
> On 21 Oct 2012, at 17:14, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> 
>> I also think the exchanges last week were good. Regardless of outcome, it is 
>> good to see active participation.
>> 
>> Regarding the GAC comment on PDP, since they explicitly suggested a 
>> moratorium on the IGO names, it sounds like they accept that a PDP is proper 
>> on those, but not on the RC/IOC names.
>> 
>> Alan
>> 
>> At 21/10/2012 04:34 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>> 
>>> While I was tied up in ALAC stuff I'm happy to have seen the progress.
>>> 
>>> I'm a little concerned by the GAC communiqué's end-of-the-meeting comment 
>>> that the PDP itself is pointless. Just wondering if the community may find 
>>> itself in a situation of needing to respond to this point,  and how. 
>>> 
>>> On 21 October 2012 10:58, Hoover, Carolyn <CHoover@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks, Mikey.  Participating has been much easier with you and Alan 
>>> helping with this process.  Thanks for your work in moving this forward and 
>>> making sure all points were considered during the process.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Carolyn Hoover
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: owner-gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx [ 
>>> mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:19 AM
>>> To: Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx DT
>>> Subject: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] weekly status report -- FINAL
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> hi all,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> here's the last weekly status report for our drafting team.  yay!  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> thanks to all -- i don't know about you but i had a great time, learned a 
>>> lot and thoroughly enjoyed the experience.  in a conversation with Marika 
>>> after the GNSO meeting i volunteered to fill the "interim chair" slot on 
>>> the PDP and would be willing to chair the thing if the votes go my way.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> mikey
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Evan Leibovitch
>>> Toronto Canada
>>> Em: evan at telly dot org
>>> Sk: evanleibovitch
>>> Tw: el56
>>> 
> 
> 
>