ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Two items that may be relevant

  • To: Thick Whois <gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Two items that may be relevant
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:41:14 -0500

There are two issues that I understand may be under discussion in the RAA amendment process that might have an impact on this PDP.

1. The September RAA Negotiation update (http://tinyurl.com/Sept-RAA) includes (Item 11) "The registrars have requested that the obligation to provide a registrar-­-operator Whois service be limited to “thin” registries (i.e., .com and .net), as “thick” registries provide centralized public data to Whois data. Registries in the New gTLD Program are required to be “thick” and follow service level agreements." The status says that there is agreement in principle. If that is a done-deal, they we can take that question off of our list.

2. There has been discussion of ICANN requiring a uniform presentation of Whois information by all registrars (http://tinyurl.com/Whois-display). I don't see this in the list of RAA topics, so I am not sure of the status. If this too is a done-deal, then uniformity of display no longer needs to be on our list. (Thanks to Michele Neylon for the heads up on this).

Perhaps Volker can update us on both of these.

Alan 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy