Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] version 2 of the drawing

[Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>]

Rick,

Responding to two messages in one email.

First, the concept of looking at some of the DSSA approaches did come up
on last week's call. I didn't hear any objections.

Second, Mikey didn't suggest using 800-53. Nor did I when I was in
security consulting and saw opportunities to use some of its approaches in
non-security contexts. His list of issues fits very well with the privacy
concerns that were kicked around on the list last week.

Finally, some people like words and others prefer eight-by-ten colour
glossy photographs with circles and arrows. Mikey, how about adding a
paragraph on the back of each one?
(Mikey should get that one.
http://www.arlo.net/resources/lyrics/alices.shtml, tenth paragraph, for
those of you who missed the sixties in the US).

Don

 

On 2/3/13 7:47 PM, "Rick Wesson" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> hi Rick,
>>
>> i'm sorry to be displeasing you.  but i'm getting pretty good support
>> (on-list and off) to continue this line of effort a little longer so i
>>fear
>> i may continue to raise your blood pressure for a while.  do know that
>>i'm
>> doing this because i think it will be useful to have a series of
>> well-documented diagrams that we can use in materials to describe our
>>work,
>> not purely to make you mad.
>
>your diagrams don't make me mad, its the fact they do not represent a
>consensus, represent the consensus and I'm good with that.
>
>making up stuff, stuff we never discussed, much less agreed upon --
>that I'll call you out on.
>
>-rick