<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] weekly status report
- To: "'Mike O'Connor'" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thick Whois WG <gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] weekly status report
- From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:26:58 +0000
Mikey,
Your status report states:
"Expert group" is assembled
but we haven't made any progress developing questions for them to answer.
My understanding is that this "experts group" consists primarily of people who
were involved in the .org transition to thick Whois (I don't know anything else
about the group). I identified several weeks ago some questions about the
transition, based on the PIR report to ICANN on the transition, that seem
relevant to our task. Don (who provided that report to our group) responded
that some of these questions would be best considered by the experts group. Do
we know if this has happened?
See http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg/msg00051.html .
Steve Metalitz
From: owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 7:41 PM
To: Thick Whois WG
Subject: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] weekly status report
weekly status report? i've gotten way behind on these. sorry about that.
i'm also sorry to say that this one is a grouchy one -- we're edging pretty
close to Beijing and need to think through what we're going to be able to
deliver by then. i think Marika and i will have a go at this first, but any
thoughts from the rest of you would be much appreciated.
thanks,
mikey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|