[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] missing recommendation in 7.1

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I was disappointed to not see the recommendation for the Issues report included 
in 7.1.    I thought we had discussed it on this list and thee had been little 
opposition, though there was some.  I cannot support this report with a strong 
recommendation for follow on work on the Privacy issues.  And, contrary to what 
others may beleive, I do not see any such work currently ongoing in ICANN.  I 
think it i s unfortunate that we keep pushing off this work and are not willing 
to face it directly.  I beleive I have the support of others in the NCSG, 
though the content of a minority statement has yet to be decided on.

While still somewhat inadequate, I am ready to argue for going along with 
consensus on this document if the following is included in 7.1:


The WG  discussed many of the issues involved in moving from having a 
registration currently governed under the privacy rules by one jurisdiction in 
a thick whois to another jurisdiction, the jurisdiction of the Registry in a 
thick whois.  The WG did not feel it was competent to fully discuss these 
privacy issues and was not able to fully separate the privacy issues involved 
in such a move from the general privacy issues that need to be resolved in 
Whois.  there was also concern with intersection with other related Privacy 
issues that ICANN currently needs to work on.  The Working group therefore 
makes the following recommendation:

 . We recommend that the ICANN Board request a GNSO issues report to cover the 
issue of Privacy as related to WHOIS and other related GNSO policies.



Thanks

avri