Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Revised language for review -- and a goal that we try to wrap this up by the end of the week

["Prosser, Susan" <susan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well done, Marika.  I support your draft.

thanks
Susan

~~~~~
*Susan Prosser
*VP, Partner & Industry Relations
DomainTools, LLC

T: (206) 838-9060
F: (206) 838-9056
E: *susan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*www.domaintools.com

*Follow Us*: Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pages/DomainTools/104523895739>
 | Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/domaintools> |
LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/domaintools>
 | YouTube <http://www.youtube.com/domaintools> |
Blog<http://blog.domaintools.com/>



On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:23 AM, George, Christopher E <
christopher.e.george@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Nice job Marika.  Your suggested wording looks good to me.****
>
>
> Chris****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Mike O'Connor
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:24 AM
> *To:* Marika Konings
> *Cc:* gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Revised language for review -- and a
> goal that we try to wrap this up by the end of the week****
>
>  ** **
>
> thanks Marika, i can live with this draft.****
>
> ** **
>
> dear all -- please take a hard look at this language and see whether we
> are at the point where we can all say "i can live with this."  i'd like to
> put a little pressure on us to try to wrap this up on the list this week --
> because the deadline for the submitting our final report for consideration
> by the Council is end of day (UTC) next Monday.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> i'm comfortable wrapping this up on the list for a couple reasons.  first,
> our agenda for the last month has been to review the status of consensus
> about the draft report -- so people have had ample opportunity to review
> it.  we're also likely to lose a fair number of people next week to the IGF
> meetings, including Avri.  so i'd like to focus this conversation on the
> list and see if we can get it done without another call.  as always, this
> isn't a hard deadline, just a goal.  but my sense is that we are pretty
> close and i think i share the view of most of us that it would be great if
> we could push this out.****
>
> ** **
>
> i imagine this language isn't perfect, but i'm hopeful that it's close
> enough.  thanks for your patience.  let's see if we can wrap this one up.*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> thanks,****
>
> ** **
>
> mikey****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> Dear All,****
>
> ** **
>
> Based on our discussions today, please find below the proposed language
> for inclusion in the Final Report which includes the edits proposed in the
> chat (in bold) in relation to the legal review. Please share your
> support/non-support and/or proposed edits with the mailing list.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> ** **
>
> Marika****
>
> ** **
>
> *The WG recommends that as part of the implementation process a legal
> review of law applicable to the transition of data from a thin to thick
> model that has not already been considered in the EWG memo is undertaken 
> anddue consideration is given to potential privacy issues that may arise from
> the discussions on the transition from thin to thick Whois, including, for
> example, guidance on how the long-standing contractual requirement that
> registrars give notice to, and obtain consent, from each registrant for
> uses of any personally identifiable data submitted by the registrant should
> apply to registrations involved in the transition. Should any privacy
> issues emerge from these transition discussions that were not anticipated
> by the WG and which would require additional policy consideration, the
> Implementation Review Team is expected to notify the GNSO Council of these
> so that appropriate action can be taken.  *****
>
> ** **
>
> *The WG recommends that following the adoption of this report and
> recommendations by the GNSO Council, the subsequent public comment forum
> (prior to Board consideration) as well as the notification by the ICANN
> Board to the GAC, specifically request input on any considerations related
> to the transition from thin to thick Whois that would need to be taken into
> account as part of the implementation process. *****
>
> ** **
>
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) ****
>
> ** **
>